Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40211 - 40220 of 68278 for did.

[PDF] State v. James D. Minniecheske
-0343-CR 3 competence, and the court’s ruling did not bar a fair presentation of Minniecheske’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12044 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Susan Vanderhoof v. Peter J. Vanderhoof
of 1 The circuit court did not set a dollar amount for family support but directed the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15550 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Wildeck, Inc. v. Thomas J. Cousar
reason. Cousar did not seek out Wildeck as the subcontractor to fabricate the security ceiling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3457 - 2017-09-20

State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
convictions, that his age did not mitigate the circumstances and his need for rehabilitation. The court also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4661 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Pastori M. Balele v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
Lightbourn, the secretary of the Department of No. 01-1753 2 Administration (DOA), did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4129 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kimberly A. Theobald
to an investigation). ¶9 The referee found that Attorney Theobald did not contest the substance of the testimony
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16794 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Venturedyne, Ltd.
, that an oral agreement to extend the capping deadline did not occur. The testimony referred to by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4025 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Harlan Richards v. Stephen Puckett
Mr. Richards notes in regards to mitigating factors that the court has determined that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13687 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
for the children did not constitute a substantial change in circumstances as a matter of law. He relies in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33343 - 2008-07-09

[PDF] Lydia Santiago v. Kathleen Ware
at 622. The court held, "The statute did not prescribe the classification process with such certainty
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8494 - 2017-09-19