Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40221 - 40230 of 59033 for do.
Search results 40221 - 40230 of 59033 for do.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
they went to Rockford. We do not deem this testimony significant. According to the portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731477 - 2023-11-22
they went to Rockford. We do not deem this testimony significant. According to the portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731477 - 2023-11-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
test (PBT) and, following his refusal to do so, arrest Foulk for OWI. Specifically, Foulk argues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=835159 - 2024-08-06
test (PBT) and, following his refusal to do so, arrest Foulk for OWI. Specifically, Foulk argues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=835159 - 2024-08-06
State v. Allen L.
not permit the State to use the CHIPS order as a sword against Allen in this TPR proceeding, neither do we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2776 - 2005-03-31
not permit the State to use the CHIPS order as a sword against Allen in this TPR proceeding, neither do we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2776 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 do so. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961948 - 2025-05-28
2 do so. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961948 - 2025-05-28
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
failure to cross-examine Leverett constituted deficient performance—an issue we do not decide—Kelly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=962034 - 2025-05-28
failure to cross-examine Leverett constituted deficient performance—an issue we do not decide—Kelly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=962034 - 2025-05-28
[PDF]
State v. Stanley Earl Applebee
the attorney did or did not do, and the basis for the challenged conduct, are factual and will be upheld
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11052 - 2017-09-19
the attorney did or did not do, and the basis for the challenged conduct, are factual and will be upheld
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11052 - 2017-09-19
State v. Mark H.K.
to determine intent. Id. at 365. Only if the language of the statute renders legislative intent ambiguous do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4905 - 2005-03-31
to determine intent. Id. at 365. Only if the language of the statute renders legislative intent ambiguous do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4905 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, was advised of his right to file a response, and did not do so. We have independently reviewed the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307029 - 2020-11-24
, was advised of his right to file a response, and did not do so. We have independently reviewed the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307029 - 2020-11-24
[PDF]
State v. Marisol A.
dealer. She then asked Smith what she would do if Marisol pulled Smith’s hair and threw a chair at her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19147 - 2017-09-21
dealer. She then asked Smith what she would do if Marisol pulled Smith’s hair and threw a chair at her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19147 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Irene Rafalski v. Edward Dusza
. We do not review claimed errors when a resolution of them would have no effect on an existing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7728 - 2017-09-19
. We do not review claimed errors when a resolution of them would have no effect on an existing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7728 - 2017-09-19