Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40221 - 40230 of 60151 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 40221 - 40230 of 60151 for quit claim deed/1000.
Dale Wiggins v. John C. Butorac
to release certain documents pursuant to the Open Records Law. Butorac claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15496 - 2005-03-31
to release certain documents pursuant to the Open Records Law. Butorac claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15496 - 2005-03-31
State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
.2d 741 (Ct. App. 1994), where we remanded for an evidentiary hearing on Issa’s claim that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5545 - 2005-03-31
.2d 741 (Ct. App. 1994), where we remanded for an evidentiary hearing on Issa’s claim that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5545 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Martin Tydrich v. Dennis Bomkamp
trees on his farm. He claims the trial court erred in computing damages: (1) by deducting the cost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11139 - 2017-09-19
trees on his farm. He claims the trial court erred in computing damages: (1) by deducting the cost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11139 - 2017-09-19
Cap Gemini America, Inc. v. Gary M. Ringstad
by a former employee, Wayne Purdy.[1] Cap Gemini claims that the trial court erred when it concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11504 - 2005-03-31
by a former employee, Wayne Purdy.[1] Cap Gemini claims that the trial court erred when it concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11504 - 2005-03-31
07AP1728 Alan Dordel v. Arlyn W. Nofke
of $5644 due P&J Kampo Electric, Inc., and $4401.54 he claims to have spent to repair or replace items
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32948 - 2008-06-10
of $5644 due P&J Kampo Electric, Inc., and $4401.54 he claims to have spent to repair or replace items
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32948 - 2008-06-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
underlying this appeal in which Jones raised a claim of newly discovered evidence based on two affidavits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967734 - 2025-06-10
underlying this appeal in which Jones raised a claim of newly discovered evidence based on two affidavits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967734 - 2025-06-10
[PDF]
B.N. v. Guy N. Giese
the Economy policy provides coverage for B.N.’s claim alleging negligent infliction of emotional distress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6717 - 2017-09-20
the Economy policy provides coverage for B.N.’s claim alleging negligent infliction of emotional distress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6717 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Westel - Milwaukee Company, Inc. v. Walworth County
. It also claimed that there was no evidence that these towers lowered area property values. Cellular One
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9453 - 2017-09-19
. It also claimed that there was no evidence that these towers lowered area property values. Cellular One
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9453 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reasserted Velazquez-Perez’s claim that he did not understand the maximum penalty. Additionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910071 - 2025-02-04
reasserted Velazquez-Perez’s claim that he did not understand the maximum penalty. Additionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910071 - 2025-02-04
State v. Jairo E. Ramos
argues that his forty-year sentence—only five years less than the maximum—is unduly harsh; and he claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14698 - 2005-03-31
argues that his forty-year sentence—only five years less than the maximum—is unduly harsh; and he claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14698 - 2005-03-31