Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40221 - 40230 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 40221 - 40230 of 58492 for speedy trial.
State v. Thomas J. Scheidegger
the trial court’s refusal to suppress that evidence. We affirm. ¶2 Tom Rastall, an agent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15648 - 2005-03-31
the trial court’s refusal to suppress that evidence. We affirm. ¶2 Tom Rastall, an agent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15648 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
probably have to be that trial counsel was ineffective by failing to obtain a decision from the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107363 - 2017-09-21
probably have to be that trial counsel was ineffective by failing to obtain a decision from the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107363 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶5 Miller again argued for default judgment at the court trial. The court again denied Miller’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161811 - 2017-09-21
. ¶5 Miller again argued for default judgment at the court trial. The court again denied Miller’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161811 - 2017-09-21
Rickly Wesley v. The City of Milwaukee
is entitled to immunity from suit pursuant to § 893.80(4), Stats. Wesley claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11700 - 2005-03-31
is entitled to immunity from suit pursuant to § 893.80(4), Stats. Wesley claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11700 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
(1996). If the motion raises such facts, the trial court must hold an evidentiary hearing. Id. at 310
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46458 - 2010-02-01
(1996). If the motion raises such facts, the trial court must hold an evidentiary hearing. Id. at 310
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46458 - 2010-02-01
CA Blank Order
arguable merit. Our review of a sentence determination “start[s] with the presumption that the trial court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121572 - 2014-09-16
arguable merit. Our review of a sentence determination “start[s] with the presumption that the trial court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121572 - 2014-09-16
[PDF]
State v. Lorne Demars
as a repeater, in that county. ¶3 The trial court ultimately sentenced Demars to sixteen years in prison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4011 - 2017-09-20
as a repeater, in that county. ¶3 The trial court ultimately sentenced Demars to sixteen years in prison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4011 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Thomas J. Scheidegger
of Scheidegger’s residence and the surrounding property. On appeal, he challenges the trial court’s refusal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15648 - 2017-09-21
of Scheidegger’s residence and the surrounding property. On appeal, he challenges the trial court’s refusal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15648 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 27, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
delivered. ¶3 On February 13, 2006, the court bound Schumacher over for trial. However, on May 17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28533 - 2007-03-26
delivered. ¶3 On February 13, 2006, the court bound Schumacher over for trial. However, on May 17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28533 - 2007-03-26
State v. Avery T., Jr.
for trial. Avery's attorney then moved this court for leave to file an appeal. We granted Avery's request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8594 - 2005-03-31
for trial. Avery's attorney then moved this court for leave to file an appeal. We granted Avery's request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8594 - 2005-03-31