Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40231 - 40240 of 64013 for records/1000.
Search results 40231 - 40240 of 64013 for records/1000.
County of Winnebago v. Larry A. Schmitz
and if it is in accordance with the facts on the record.” Id. We are compelled to conclude that Schmitz’s Quelle argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3227 - 2005-03-31
and if it is in accordance with the facts on the record.” Id. We are compelled to conclude that Schmitz’s Quelle argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3227 - 2005-03-31
Paul Peltonen v. Brian Richtig
the record for evidence to support the findings that the trial court made, not for findings that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14905 - 2005-03-31
the record for evidence to support the findings that the trial court made, not for findings that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14905 - 2005-03-31
Kathryn A. Pinter v. Linda Pinter
. The record contains affidavits of Tax Air's payroll manager, which indicate that Robert was employed by Tax
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9710 - 2005-03-31
. The record contains affidavits of Tax Air's payroll manager, which indicate that Robert was employed by Tax
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9710 - 2005-03-31
Elizabeth H. Taylor v. James A. Taylor
for bringing a frivolous motion. James contends that the court's finding is not supported by the record. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9911 - 2013-03-27
for bringing a frivolous motion. James contends that the court's finding is not supported by the record. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9911 - 2013-03-27
Gerald F. Houtakker v. Carol Carew
. 1983). In reviewing whether the trial court clearly erred, we must examine the record "`not for facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9899 - 2010-11-11
. 1983). In reviewing whether the trial court clearly erred, we must examine the record "`not for facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9899 - 2010-11-11
COURT OF APPEALS
to circuit court without a new trial. The circuit court judge will review a transcript of the tape recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90905 - 2012-12-20
to circuit court without a new trial. The circuit court judge will review a transcript of the tape recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90905 - 2012-12-20
COURT OF APPEALS
, the opportunity to provide evidence at a later hearing. While the record reflects that another hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64172 - 2011-05-17
, the opportunity to provide evidence at a later hearing. While the record reflects that another hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64172 - 2011-05-17
COURT OF APPEALS
reviewed the record and reject both of these arguments. ¶6 The trial court based its decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56355 - 2010-11-03
reviewed the record and reject both of these arguments. ¶6 The trial court based its decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56355 - 2010-11-03
COURT OF APPEALS
the facts of record and reasons its way to a rational, legally sound conclusion.” Prosser v. Cook, 185 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34980 - 2008-12-22
the facts of record and reasons its way to a rational, legally sound conclusion.” Prosser v. Cook, 185 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34980 - 2008-12-22
State v. Derrick Emerson
251, 256-57, 513 N.W.2d 631 (Ct. App. 1994). We look to see whether the record demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6737 - 2005-03-31
251, 256-57, 513 N.W.2d 631 (Ct. App. 1994). We look to see whether the record demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6737 - 2005-03-31