Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40241 - 40250 of 63758 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 40241 - 40250 of 63758 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
his motion for postconviction relief. He contends that he is entitled to withdraw his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33184 - 2008-06-25
his motion for postconviction relief. He contends that he is entitled to withdraw his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33184 - 2008-06-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
granted his motion to suppress all evidence obtained during a roadside stop of his vehicle. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88301 - 2014-09-15
granted his motion to suppress all evidence obtained during a roadside stop of his vehicle. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88301 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
battery. ¶7 Rolack subsequently filed a postconviction motion alleging that the State withheld
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39043 - 2014-09-15
battery. ¶7 Rolack subsequently filed a postconviction motion alleging that the State withheld
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39043 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denial of his suppression motion. Copeland contends that the warrantless installation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98391 - 2014-09-15
denial of his suppression motion. Copeland contends that the warrantless installation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98391 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
for six months. ¶5 Katmeh made a motion in limine to exclude evidence of the past complaints
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32750 - 2014-09-15
for six months. ¶5 Katmeh made a motion in limine to exclude evidence of the past complaints
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32750 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
denying its motion to dismiss. DOT argues that the trial court lacked competency to entertain the Meises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30501 - 2007-10-03
denying its motion to dismiss. DOT argues that the trial court lacked competency to entertain the Meises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30501 - 2007-10-03
COURT OF APPEALS
for repeated sexual assault of a child, and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Laskowski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92969 - 2013-02-18
for repeated sexual assault of a child, and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Laskowski
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92969 - 2013-02-18
COURT OF APPEALS
and erred by denying his motion for postconviction relief. We reject Jensen’s arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54987 - 2010-10-04
and erred by denying his motion for postconviction relief. We reject Jensen’s arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54987 - 2010-10-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
3 ¶5 T.C.G. was present at the August 29, 2017 motion hearing and final pretrial. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223780 - 2018-10-23
3 ¶5 T.C.G. was present at the August 29, 2017 motion hearing and final pretrial. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223780 - 2018-10-23
State v. Jessie L. Stokes
an order denying his motion for sentence modification. He claims the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26400 - 2006-09-06
an order denying his motion for sentence modification. He claims the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26400 - 2006-09-06