Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40241 - 40250 of 64027 for records/1000.
Search results 40241 - 40250 of 64027 for records/1000.
Elizabeth H. Taylor v. James A. Taylor
for bringing a frivolous motion. James contends that the court's finding is not supported by the record. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9911 - 2005-03-31
for bringing a frivolous motion. James contends that the court's finding is not supported by the record. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9911 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
through the review of state records by Herzfeldt’s dispatcher that Smith did not have a valid 2007 fishing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33784 - 2008-08-19
through the review of state records by Herzfeldt’s dispatcher that Smith did not have a valid 2007 fishing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33784 - 2008-08-19
COURT OF APPEALS
,” the record provides otherwise. Schaar contends that his reimprisonment after revocation on the predicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33010 - 2008-06-11
,” the record provides otherwise. Schaar contends that his reimprisonment after revocation on the predicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33010 - 2008-06-11
COURT OF APPEALS
probable cause. We disagree. ¶14 The undisputed facts as disclosed from the record reveal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55771 - 2010-10-20
probable cause. We disagree. ¶14 The undisputed facts as disclosed from the record reveal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55771 - 2010-10-20
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051072 - 2025-12-17
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051072 - 2025-12-17
Edward M. Moran v. Lakeview Investments
was not prepared to do so. The record shows that he did present evidence with respect to all three contracts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7404 - 2005-03-31
was not prepared to do so. The record shows that he did present evidence with respect to all three contracts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7404 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
misrepresents the record. ETA’s letter brief explicitly requested that the court not issue a stay. Aside from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104447 - 2005-03-31
misrepresents the record. ETA’s letter brief explicitly requested that the court not issue a stay. Aside from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104447 - 2005-03-31
Kohler Company v. Village of Kohler
, 182 Wis.2d 367, 372, 514 N.W.2d 48, 49 (Ct. App. 1994). We independently examine the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12000 - 2009-07-29
, 182 Wis.2d 367, 372, 514 N.W.2d 48, 49 (Ct. App. 1994). We independently examine the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12000 - 2009-07-29
City of Madison v. Carl J. Bock
alcohol assessment and points, apparently on the OMVWI count.[2] The defendant appealed under the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13109 - 2015-03-10
alcohol assessment and points, apparently on the OMVWI count.[2] The defendant appealed under the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13109 - 2015-03-10
Gerald F. Houtakker v. Carol Carew
. 1983). In reviewing whether the trial court clearly erred, we must examine the record "`not for facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9899 - 2005-03-31
. 1983). In reviewing whether the trial court clearly erred, we must examine the record "`not for facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9899 - 2005-03-31