Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40251 - 40260 of 59051 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 40251 - 40260 of 59051 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
State v. Carlos R. Delgado
for the credibility of the victims. He also claims that the State made improper use of the expert’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3587 - 2017-09-19
for the credibility of the victims. He also claims that the State made improper use of the expert’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3587 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of, claimed improprieties in the prosecutor’s closing argument.[1] Trial counsel explained her actions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59410 - 2011-02-01
of, claimed improprieties in the prosecutor’s closing argument.[1] Trial counsel explained her actions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59410 - 2011-02-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Kruger’s claim that he was psychotic and delusional at the time of the plea hearing was not credible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209092 - 2018-03-01
that Kruger’s claim that he was psychotic and delusional at the time of the plea hearing was not credible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209092 - 2018-03-01
CA Blank Order
. There is no arguable merit to a claim of incompetency to enter the plea: Miller had been successfully restored
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103795 - 2013-10-29
. There is no arguable merit to a claim of incompetency to enter the plea: Miller had been successfully restored
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103795 - 2013-10-29
COURT OF APPEALS
the repayment at all based on claims of hardship (by the mechanism of invading Michael’s otherwise non-divisible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30825 - 2007-11-07
the repayment at all based on claims of hardship (by the mechanism of invading Michael’s otherwise non-divisible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30825 - 2007-11-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Jackson filed a postconviction motion for a new trial, claiming that prejudicial pretrial publicity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=325366 - 2021-01-20
. Jackson filed a postconviction motion for a new trial, claiming that prejudicial pretrial publicity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=325366 - 2021-01-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
claim fails. Finally, we conclude that Hackel is not entitled to a new trial in the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137823 - 2017-09-21
claim fails. Finally, we conclude that Hackel is not entitled to a new trial in the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137823 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
was held. At trial, Brown’s attorney attacked the “show-up” identification, claiming this was a case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34158 - 2008-09-29
was held. At trial, Brown’s attorney attacked the “show-up” identification, claiming this was a case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34158 - 2008-09-29
[PDF]
State v. William E. Draughon III
of counsel claim as well as his claim that the real controversy was not fully tried. Our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18636 - 2017-09-21
of counsel claim as well as his claim that the real controversy was not fully tried. Our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18636 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael Johnson
to a penalty enhancer under WIS. STAT. § 961.49. No. 00-0645-CR 4 double jeopardy claim. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2353 - 2017-09-19
to a penalty enhancer under WIS. STAT. § 961.49. No. 00-0645-CR 4 double jeopardy claim. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2353 - 2017-09-19