Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40261 - 40270 of 63379 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 40261 - 40270 of 63379 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals an order denying his postconviction motion without a hearing. Strickland argues that: (1) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241564 - 2019-06-04
appeals an order denying his postconviction motion without a hearing. Strickland argues that: (1) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241564 - 2019-06-04
State v. Maxie W. Harvey, Jr.
of § 343.44(1), Stats., and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Harvey, who was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14462 - 2005-03-31
of § 343.44(1), Stats., and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Harvey, who was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14462 - 2005-03-31
State v. Roger A. Urbick
motion to suppress evidence. Urbick argues the officer did not have the required reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14964 - 2005-03-31
motion to suppress evidence. Urbick argues the officer did not have the required reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14964 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
conviction, and orders denying motions for sentence modification in each case. We affirm for the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26847 - 2006-10-18
conviction, and orders denying motions for sentence modification in each case. We affirm for the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26847 - 2006-10-18
State v. Richard L. Nemetz
, and one count of fleeing an officer. He contends that the trial court erred by denying his motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6701 - 2005-03-31
, and one count of fleeing an officer. He contends that the trial court erred by denying his motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6701 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
entered and (2) whether the circuit court erroneously denied West’s motion to suppress for lack
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103041 - 2013-10-15
entered and (2) whether the circuit court erroneously denied West’s motion to suppress for lack
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103041 - 2013-10-15
Antigo Homes, Inc. v. John K. Raimer
the Raimers filed their counterclaim, they also filed a motion for change of venue. The clerk’s minutes state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7229 - 2005-03-31
the Raimers filed their counterclaim, they also filed a motion for change of venue. The clerk’s minutes state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7229 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, and orders denying motions for sentence modification in each case. We affirm for the reasons discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26847 - 2014-09-15
, and orders denying motions for sentence modification in each case. We affirm for the reasons discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26847 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
City of Menomonie v. Jeno D. Herman
his motion to suppress because the arresting officer did not have reasonable suspicion to request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4189 - 2017-09-19
his motion to suppress because the arresting officer did not have reasonable suspicion to request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4189 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of THC (<= 200 grams) with intent to deliver, second and subsequent offense. He contends that his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104482 - 2013-11-19
of THC (<= 200 grams) with intent to deliver, second and subsequent offense. He contends that his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104482 - 2013-11-19