Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40281 - 40290 of 59723 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 40281 - 40290 of 59723 for quit claim deed/1000.
CA Blank Order
current claim that he was led to believe he would only have two years of probation. The circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102132 - 2013-09-16
current claim that he was led to believe he would only have two years of probation. The circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102132 - 2013-09-16
COURT OF APPEALS
of proving a fair and just reason. It rejected his claim of being rushed because the case had been going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93745 - 2013-03-12
of proving a fair and just reason. It rejected his claim of being rushed because the case had been going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93745 - 2013-03-12
State v. Leng Xiong
(1994), prohibit a defendant from pursuing a claim in a subsequent § 974.06 motion that could have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21749 - 2006-03-13
(1994), prohibit a defendant from pursuing a claim in a subsequent § 974.06 motion that could have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21749 - 2006-03-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his claimed indigency. The court found, in effect, that Fox was not indigent and that Fox
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622750 - 2023-02-16
his claimed indigency. The court found, in effect, that Fox was not indigent and that Fox
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622750 - 2023-02-16
[PDF]
State v. Leng Xiong
a defendant from pursuing a claim in a subsequent § 974.06 motion that could have been raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21749 - 2017-09-21
a defendant from pursuing a claim in a subsequent § 974.06 motion that could have been raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21749 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
would not consider the following issues raised for the first time on appeal: “Hessil’s claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117960 - 2014-09-15
would not consider the following issues raised for the first time on appeal: “Hessil’s claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117960 - 2014-09-15
State v. Andre Bolden
denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims that his lawyer gave him ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5858 - 2005-03-31
denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims that his lawyer gave him ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5858 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
at 185-86. Whether Escalona’s procedural bar applies to a postconviction claim is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31638 - 2008-01-28
at 185-86. Whether Escalona’s procedural bar applies to a postconviction claim is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31638 - 2008-01-28
State v. Armando Hernandez-Diaz
denying him postconviction relief. He claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12187 - 2005-03-31
denying him postconviction relief. He claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12187 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
to suppress the evidence. Id. at 69. ¶7 When reviewing a claim that evidence was lost or destroyed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42672 - 2014-09-15
to suppress the evidence. Id. at 69. ¶7 When reviewing a claim that evidence was lost or destroyed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42672 - 2014-09-15