Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40291 - 40300 of 63359 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 40291 - 40300 of 63359 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a judgment of conviction and an order denying her postconviction motion. She contends that the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206748 - 2018-01-10
a judgment of conviction and an order denying her postconviction motion. She contends that the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206748 - 2018-01-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, JJ. Sean E. Wyman appeals from a judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163905 - 2017-09-21
, JJ. Sean E. Wyman appeals from a judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163905 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Dale A. Coppock
court erred in denying his “Motion to Suppress Statements and Evidence due to Unlawful Seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4980 - 2017-09-19
court erred in denying his “Motion to Suppress Statements and Evidence due to Unlawful Seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4980 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Robert W. Miller
serving the sentence immediately, and on February 10, 2000, he filed a motion seeking Huber law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2410 - 2017-09-19
serving the sentence immediately, and on February 10, 2000, he filed a motion seeking Huber law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2410 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
$5,440.60 in restitution and an order denying his postconviction motion challenging the restitution award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28317 - 2007-03-05
$5,440.60 in restitution and an order denying his postconviction motion challenging the restitution award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28317 - 2007-03-05
COURT OF APPEALS
his suppression motion because the officer lacked reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106091 - 2013-12-26
his suppression motion because the officer lacked reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106091 - 2013-12-26
COURT OF APPEALS
and an order denying his postconviction motion. He asserts the evidence was insufficient to support his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70353 - 2011-08-29
and an order denying his postconviction motion. He asserts the evidence was insufficient to support his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70353 - 2011-08-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
own motion, we now remove Dustin Peterson from the caption for this appeal. This order will be sent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=523194 - 2022-05-19
own motion, we now remove Dustin Peterson from the caption for this appeal. This order will be sent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=523194 - 2022-05-19
State v. Mack A. Kradenych
violated Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968). The circuit court held a hearing and denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2713 - 2005-03-31
violated Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968). The circuit court held a hearing and denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2713 - 2005-03-31
Pierce County v. Amy F.
Amy’s motion. The court concluded that because Amy had the statutorily prescribed notices through
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7551 - 2005-03-31
Amy’s motion. The court concluded that because Amy had the statutorily prescribed notices through
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7551 - 2005-03-31