Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4031 - 4040 of 30021 for de.
Search results 4031 - 4040 of 30021 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law for de novo review. Town Bank v. City Real Estate Dev., LLC, 2010 WI 134, ¶32, 330 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184491 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law for de novo review. Town Bank v. City Real Estate Dev., LLC, 2010 WI 134, ¶32, 330 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184491 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s order de novo, because “the interpretation of an insurance contract and the legal effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142339 - 2015-05-26
court’s order de novo, because “the interpretation of an insurance contract and the legal effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142339 - 2015-05-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
set of facts presents a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Evans, 2000 WI App 178
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33995 - 2014-09-15
set of facts presents a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Evans, 2000 WI App 178
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33995 - 2014-09-15
State v. Stanley A. Otis
is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Ludwigson, 212 Wis.2d 871, 875, 569 N.W.2d 762, 764
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15800 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Ludwigson, 212 Wis.2d 871, 875, 569 N.W.2d 762, 764
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15800 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kirk J. Bergquist
interpretations are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. City of Oak Creek, 2000 WI 9, ¶18, 232
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3764 - 2011-11-24
interpretations are questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. City of Oak Creek, 2000 WI 9, ¶18, 232
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3764 - 2011-11-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226709 - 2018-11-08
court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226709 - 2018-11-08
COURT OF APPEALS
: Robert p. van de hey, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HIGGINBOTHAM, J.[1] Samuel R. Anderson appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96839 - 2013-05-15
: Robert p. van de hey, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HIGGINBOTHAM, J.[1] Samuel R. Anderson appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96839 - 2013-05-15
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. State v. Evans, 2000 WI App 178, ¶12, 238 Wis. 2d 411, 617 N.W.2d 220. ¶8 Loutsch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33995 - 2008-09-16
review de novo. State v. Evans, 2000 WI App 178, ¶12, 238 Wis. 2d 411, 617 N.W.2d 220. ¶8 Loutsch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33995 - 2008-09-16
[PDF]
Thomas J. Brennan v. Gjerdingen Farms, Inc.
, and that they agree that the uncontested facts present a question of law that may appropriately be decided de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3238 - 2017-09-19
, and that they agree that the uncontested facts present a question of law that may appropriately be decided de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3238 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
] had answered, been found in default, and again objected, requesting a de novo hearing, in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60752 - 2014-09-15
] had answered, been found in default, and again objected, requesting a de novo hearing, in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60752 - 2014-09-15