Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4031 - 4040 of 8261 for gf-175.

[PDF] NOTICE
to adequately explain the sentence it renders. See id., ¶¶53-55; State v. Echols, 175 Wis. 2d 653, 682-83
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34314 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Timothy Repetti v. Sysco Corporation
. v. Milwaukee Metro. Sewerage Dist., 175 Wis. 2d 527, 533, 499 N.W.2d 282 (Ct. App. 1993). ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21016 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Anthony Mark Caravella
and the demeanor of the defendant in each case. See State v. Echols, 175 Wis. 2d 653, 682, 499 N.W.2d 631 (1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24944 - 2017-09-21

State v. David W. Oakley
v. Miller, 175 Wis.2d 204, 207-08, 499 N.W.2d 215, 216 (Ct. App. 1993), the defendant was placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13902 - 2005-03-31

State v. Brian A. Schultz
. Selmon, 175 Wis. 2d 155, 161, 498 N.W.2d 876 (1993). Wisconsin employs a two-part test for multiplicity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3329 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Mary H.-P. v. State
that a reasonable judge could reach.” Loy v. Bunderson, 107 Wis.2d 400, 414-15, 320 N.W.2d 175, 184 (1982). We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12109 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. M & I First Nat’l Bank v. Episcopal Homes Mgmt., Inc., 195 Wis. 2d 485, 496, 536 N.W.2d 175 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79645 - 2014-09-15

Polk-Burnett Electric Cooperative v. Gary A. Pavlicek
as a matter of law. M&I First Nat'l Bank v. Episcopal Homes Mgmt., 195 Wis. 2d 485, 497, 536 N.W.2d 175 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5490 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, not hypothetical facts in other situations.’” State v. McReynolds, 2022 WI App 25, ¶57, 402 Wis. 2d 175, 975
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=694867 - 2023-08-29

COURT OF APPEALS
to determining whether there was an erroneous exercise of discretion. See State v. Echols, 175 Wis. 2d 653, 681
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108601 - 2014-03-03