Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4031 - 4040 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Search results 4031 - 4040 of 58458 for speedy trial.
State v. Douglas E. Smith
an officer, see Wis. Stat. § 946.41(1), as an habitual criminal, see Wis. Stat. § 939.62, and from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4933 - 2005-03-31
an officer, see Wis. Stat. § 946.41(1), as an habitual criminal, see Wis. Stat. § 939.62, and from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4933 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert W. Gossar
-2139-CR 2 for a new trial.1 Gossar contends that the prosecutor’s peremptory striking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14311 - 2014-09-15
-2139-CR 2 for a new trial.1 Gossar contends that the prosecutor’s peremptory striking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14311 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James Buckett
the sentence was a proper exercise of the trial court's discretion, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8020 - 2017-09-19
the sentence was a proper exercise of the trial court's discretion, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8020 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
of conviction entered against him. He argues that the trial court committed No. 2007AP1741-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34159 - 2014-09-15
of conviction entered against him. He argues that the trial court committed No. 2007AP1741-CR 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34159 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
William T. Painter v. Ralph L. Zaun
. William T. Painter appeals from an order vacating a jury verdict and ordering a new trial.1 Ralph L
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10322 - 2017-09-20
. William T. Painter appeals from an order vacating a jury verdict and ordering a new trial.1 Ralph L
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10322 - 2017-09-20
William T. Painter v. Ralph L. Zaun
a jury verdict and ordering a new trial.[1] Ralph L. Zaun cross-appeals challenging the jury verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10322 - 2005-03-31
a jury verdict and ordering a new trial.[1] Ralph L. Zaun cross-appeals challenging the jury verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10322 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James L. Gilmore
, after a trial by jury. The trial court issued consecutive fifteen- and five-year prison sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12538 - 2017-09-21
, after a trial by jury. The trial court issued consecutive fifteen- and five-year prison sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12538 - 2017-09-21
Foremost Industrial Exchange v. Scott Applin
unsuccessfully to get discovery responses from the defendants in that action, the trial court entered a default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17972 - 2005-05-02
unsuccessfully to get discovery responses from the defendants in that action, the trial court entered a default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17972 - 2005-05-02
State v. Kenneth Heinrich
. The State appeals from an order granting a new trial to Kenneth Heinrich. The trial court granted Heinrich
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12655 - 2005-03-31
. The State appeals from an order granting a new trial to Kenneth Heinrich. The trial court granted Heinrich
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12655 - 2005-03-31
State v. Feleipe Harris
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by imposing a fifteen-year sentence following his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8629 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by imposing a fifteen-year sentence following his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8629 - 2005-03-31