Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4031 - 4040 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 4031 - 4040 of 58285 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his postconviction motion. He argues that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=278671 - 2020-08-18
denying his postconviction motion. He argues that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=278671 - 2020-08-18
State v. Stanley Lee Felton
consideration: (1) whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in excluding evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9649 - 2005-03-31
consideration: (1) whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in excluding evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9649 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence: the recantation of trial testimony from one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=661437 - 2023-05-31
motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence: the recantation of trial testimony from one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=661437 - 2023-05-31
[PDF]
WI APP 28
. The State of Wisconsin appeals an order of the postconviction court granting a new trial to Todd Brian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162821 - 2017-09-21
. The State of Wisconsin appeals an order of the postconviction court granting a new trial to Todd Brian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162821 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Whipp
as a repeater and from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. We address the issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12537 - 2017-09-21
as a repeater and from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. We address the issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12537 - 2017-09-21
Jon D. Williams v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund
dismissed as a sanction for the plaintiffs’ attorney’s misconduct, and, alternatively, whether a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15337 - 2005-03-31
dismissed as a sanction for the plaintiffs’ attorney’s misconduct, and, alternatively, whether a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15337 - 2005-03-31
State v. John T. Neita
to §§ 161.14(7)(a), 161.41(1m)(cm)4, 939.05 and 161.48, Stats., 1991-92. The trial court imposed a fourteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9832 - 2005-03-31
to §§ 161.14(7)(a), 161.41(1m)(cm)4, 939.05 and 161.48, Stats., 1991-92. The trial court imposed a fourteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9832 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert W. Gossar
) and 939.32(1)(a), Stats., and from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial.[1] Gossar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14311 - 2005-03-31
) and 939.32(1)(a), Stats., and from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial.[1] Gossar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14311 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Douglas E. Smith
. § 939.62, and from the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4933 - 2017-09-19
. § 939.62, and from the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4933 - 2017-09-19
State v. Feleipe Harris
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by imposing a fifteen-year sentence following his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8629 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by imposing a fifteen-year sentence following his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8629 - 2005-03-31