Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4031 - 4040 of 58479 for speedy trial.
Search results 4031 - 4040 of 58479 for speedy trial.
Cynthia M. Stocking v. James Stocking
of this court dated April 12, 1999. The Estate claims the trial court erred when it: (1) allowed testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14236 - 2005-03-31
of this court dated April 12, 1999. The Estate claims the trial court erred when it: (1) allowed testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14236 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Richard M. Pease, Jr.
request for a new trial that are either waived or lack merit. We affirm. ¶2 Pease was convicted in 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16288 - 2017-09-21
request for a new trial that are either waived or lack merit. We affirm. ¶2 Pease was convicted in 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16288 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
William T. Painter v. Ralph L. Zaun
. William T. Painter appeals from an order vacating a jury verdict and ordering a new trial.1 Ralph L
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10322 - 2017-09-20
. William T. Painter appeals from an order vacating a jury verdict and ordering a new trial.1 Ralph L
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10322 - 2017-09-20
State v. John T. Neita
to §§ 161.14(7)(a), 161.41(1m)(cm)4, 939.05 and 161.48, Stats., 1991-92. The trial court imposed a fourteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9832 - 2005-03-31
to §§ 161.14(7)(a), 161.41(1m)(cm)4, 939.05 and 161.48, Stats., 1991-92. The trial court imposed a fourteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9832 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert W. Gossar
) and 939.32(1)(a), Stats., and from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial.[1] Gossar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14311 - 2005-03-31
) and 939.32(1)(a), Stats., and from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial.[1] Gossar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14311 - 2005-03-31
Foremost Industrial Exchange v. Scott Applin
unsuccessfully to get discovery responses from the defendants in that action, the trial court entered a default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17972 - 2005-05-02
unsuccessfully to get discovery responses from the defendants in that action, the trial court entered a default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17972 - 2005-05-02
COURT OF APPEALS
order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea.[1] He claims his trial counsel gave him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114894 - 2014-06-23
order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea.[1] He claims his trial counsel gave him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114894 - 2014-06-23
State v. Feleipe Harris
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by imposing a fifteen-year sentence following his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8629 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by imposing a fifteen-year sentence following his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8629 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Foremost Industrial Exchange v. Scott Applin
responses from the defendants in that action, the trial court entered a default judgment against Obst
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17972 - 2017-09-21
responses from the defendants in that action, the trial court entered a default judgment against Obst
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17972 - 2017-09-21
Bethann Burazin Zaffiro v. Richard Lawrence Zaffiro
degree. The trial court found that Richard had income of $80,200 per year from his employment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6990 - 2005-03-31
degree. The trial court found that Richard had income of $80,200 per year from his employment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6990 - 2005-03-31