Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4031 - 4040 of 20925 for word.
Search results 4031 - 4040 of 20925 for word.
[PDF]
State v. Gregory N. Olson
intent. State v. R.R.E., 162 Wis.2d 698, 707, 470 N.W.2d 283, 286 (1991). Although the word "shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13544 - 2017-09-21
intent. State v. R.R.E., 162 Wis.2d 698, 707, 470 N.W.2d 283, 286 (1991). Although the word "shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13544 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
testified that he did have a telephone conversation with Delores in which he used the words “I’m sorry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53745 - 2010-08-25
testified that he did have a telephone conversation with Delores in which he used the words “I’m sorry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53745 - 2010-08-25
[PDF]
State v. Frederick Wright
). For purposes of statutory interpretation or construction, the common and approved usage of words may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11388 - 2017-09-19
). For purposes of statutory interpretation or construction, the common and approved usage of words may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11388 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
we quote from his responses, we have adjusted the capitalization of some words. 3 As we explain
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149398 - 2017-09-21
we quote from his responses, we have adjusted the capitalization of some words. 3 As we explain
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149398 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 99
; and (5) the wording of the preliminary and final resolutions did not conform with § 66.0703. Both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153581 - 2017-09-21
; and (5) the wording of the preliminary and final resolutions did not conform with § 66.0703. Both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153581 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
on the wording of the jury instruction. ¶18 Similarly, there is no merit to his claim that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29357 - 2007-06-18
on the wording of the jury instruction. ¶18 Similarly, there is no merit to his claim that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29357 - 2007-06-18
[PDF]
State v. Michael A. DeLain
the word ‘intentionally.’” Id. (emphasis added). ¶11 In WIS. STAT. § 940.22(2), the words “patient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6469 - 2017-09-19
the word ‘intentionally.’” Id. (emphasis added). ¶11 In WIS. STAT. § 940.22(2), the words “patient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6469 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 44
or specially defined words or phrases are given their technical or special definitional meaning. State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35869 - 2014-09-15
or specially defined words or phrases are given their technical or special definitional meaning. State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35869 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
King’s words on her arm. ¶14 Ultimately, the court denied the Batson motion, concluding that R.D.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214316 - 2018-06-19
King’s words on her arm. ¶14 Ultimately, the court denied the Batson motion, concluding that R.D.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214316 - 2018-06-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” the matter off. He made an effort, but in the trial court’s words, just “did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73058 - 2014-09-15
” the matter off. He made an effort, but in the trial court’s words, just “did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73058 - 2014-09-15