Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40301 - 40310 of 57351 for id.
Search results 40301 - 40310 of 57351 for id.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the record. Id. ¶11 Because the State’s motion to exclude any allegations of Theresa’s sexualized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=454289 - 2021-11-23
in the record. Id. ¶11 Because the State’s motion to exclude any allegations of Theresa’s sexualized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=454289 - 2021-11-23
[PDF]
State v. James A. H.
“for the purpose of punishment.” Id. at 396. We also concluded, however, that a circuit court could erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4070 - 2017-09-20
“for the purpose of punishment.” Id. at 396. We also concluded, however, that a circuit court could erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4070 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
determining that the elements were met as a matter of law. See id. at 131-33. We note
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29936 - 2014-09-15
determining that the elements were met as a matter of law. See id. at 131-33. We note
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29936 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and using a demonstrated rational process, reached a conclusion that a reasonable judge could reach.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172752 - 2017-09-21
, and using a demonstrated rational process, reached a conclusion that a reasonable judge could reach.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172752 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Sheila E. Novin
. Id., 165 Wis.2d at 320 n.1, 477 N.W.2d at 89 n.1. We will not overturn a trial court’s evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12627 - 2017-09-21
. Id., 165 Wis.2d at 320 n.1, 477 N.W.2d at 89 n.1. We will not overturn a trial court’s evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12627 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
determination. Id., ¶41. Discussion ¶11 Merkel argues that the circuit court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54225 - 2014-09-15
determination. Id., ¶41. Discussion ¶11 Merkel argues that the circuit court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54225 - 2014-09-15
State v. Raheim Cason
and the facts of record.” Id. at 500. ¶9 Under pertinent case law, the trial court may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3761 - 2005-03-31
and the facts of record.” Id. at 500. ¶9 Under pertinent case law, the trial court may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3761 - 2005-03-31
State v. David R.W.
of the rape shield law and therefore concluded that it was inadmissible. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10758 - 2005-03-31
of the rape shield law and therefore concluded that it was inadmissible. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10758 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“were not specific for marijuana.” Id. at 270. The court stated: The prosecution has the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175060 - 2017-09-21
“were not specific for marijuana.” Id. at 270. The court stated: The prosecution has the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175060 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Roberta L. Gorenstein v. Ralph G. Gorenstein
). We review conclusions of law de novo. See id. at 147, 502 N.W.2d at 922. Findings of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12300 - 2017-09-21
). We review conclusions of law de novo. See id. at 147, 502 N.W.2d at 922. Findings of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12300 - 2017-09-21