Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40301 - 40310 of 57351 for id.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the actor’s action was a substantial factor in contributing to the result.” Id. at 160. Where, as here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370546 - 2021-05-25

[PDF] Milwaukee District Council 48 v. Milwaukee County
of discretion. See id. A court erroneously exercises discretion when it proceeds on an incorrect legal basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13912 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Carl C. Martin
is ... on the defendant to overcome a strong presumption that counsel acted reasonably within professional norms." Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7949 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
elements with the same quantum of proof’ as an initial commitment.” Id. (citing Waukesha County v. J.W.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=587783 - 2022-11-08

COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient. Id.; State v. McDowell, 2004 WI 70, ¶49, 272 Wis. 2d 488, 681 N.W.2d 500. Second, the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39257 - 2009-08-10

COURT OF APPEALS
was a correct statement of the law, and the instruction comported with the facts of the case ....” Id. (quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59772 - 2011-02-07

William F. Kelsey v. Jens Otto Luebow
parties. Id. at 458, 319 N.W.2d at 845-46. [4] Finally, Luebow argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11864 - 2005-03-31

Shelby L.K. v. Steven O.
responsibilities and may base its support award on the father’s earning capacity or potential earnings.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12194 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, 373 Wis. 2d 468, 893 N.W.2d 812 (quoted source omitted). This creates “‘a two-step inquiry.’” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=883294 - 2024-12-05

Linda M. Goberville v. Brad J. Goberville
is in the child’s best interests is a mixed question of law and fact. Id. at 530-31. The trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7650 - 2005-03-31