Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40311 - 40320 of 58250 for speedy trial.
Search results 40311 - 40320 of 58250 for speedy trial.
Frontsheet
that would have required him to testify at one of his accomplice's trials. The accomplice he refused
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29552 - 2007-06-28
that would have required him to testify at one of his accomplice's trials. The accomplice he refused
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29552 - 2007-06-28
Courtney F. v. Ramiro M.C.
that the trial courts are the arbiters of discovery disputes. See, e.g., Shier v. Freedman, 49 Wis. 2d 41, 43
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7032 - 2005-03-31
that the trial courts are the arbiters of discovery disputes. See, e.g., Shier v. Freedman, 49 Wis. 2d 41, 43
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7032 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and an order denying his postconviction motion for a No. 2017AP459-CR 2 new trial. Storm argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206785 - 2018-01-09
and an order denying his postconviction motion for a No. 2017AP459-CR 2 new trial. Storm argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206785 - 2018-01-09
Kevin Thomas v. David H. Schwarz
on August 17, 1999. The trial court imposed and stayed a sentence of two years on each count, to be served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25770 - 2006-08-06
on August 17, 1999. The trial court imposed and stayed a sentence of two years on each count, to be served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25770 - 2006-08-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
rulings that Fetzer’s statements are defamatory and that his motions for a new trial should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=703208 - 2023-09-14
rulings that Fetzer’s statements are defamatory and that his motions for a new trial should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=703208 - 2023-09-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
In addition to Kathleen and Joseph, the only other witness called at trial was an engineering recruiter who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158694 - 2017-09-21
In addition to Kathleen and Joseph, the only other witness called at trial was an engineering recruiter who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158694 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Courtney F. v. Ramiro M.C.
action….” Id. (emphasis added). Case law has long held that the trial courts are the arbiters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7032 - 2017-09-20
action….” Id. (emphasis added). Case law has long held that the trial courts are the arbiters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7032 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
so that he may be resentenced before a different judge. Sprague argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959098 - 2025-05-20
so that he may be resentenced before a different judge. Sprague argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959098 - 2025-05-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
to withdraw his pleas.1 Castaneda argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his pleas because trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50893 - 2014-09-15
to withdraw his pleas.1 Castaneda argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his pleas because trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50893 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
pleas.[1] Castaneda argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his pleas because trial counsel who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50893 - 2010-06-14
pleas.[1] Castaneda argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his pleas because trial counsel who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50893 - 2010-06-14