Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40351 - 40360 of 63388 for Motion for joint custody.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
followed by seven years of extended supervision. Through counsel, Pacey filed a postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1003403 - 2025-09-03

[PDF] State v. Richard T. Peffer
probable cause to arrest him and, therefore, that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2188 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Dung Tran Nguyen
alcohol content. Nguyen argues that the trial court erred by denying his suppression motion based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5801 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Paul J. Koch
and a copy of Koch’s driving record. Koch filed numerous motions. The motion at issue here sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13237 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
extended supervision, and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief.1 He argues the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28217 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Lavell D. Love
and an order denying his postconviction motion. The sole issue on appeal is whether Love’s inculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26085 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 27, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
, and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief.[1] He argues the circuit court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28217 - 2007-02-26

[PDF] CA Blank Order
was constitutionally ineffective by failing to advance a pro se motion to dismiss that Oliver had filed. The one
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=903012 - 2025-01-22

[PDF] Marathon County Department of Social Services v. Eli J. O., Sr.
. ¶5 Counsel for Kyra was appointed on November 23, 2004. Kyra’s counsel filed a motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19562 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
rotation, denied Margaret’s motion to reconsider Judge Dugan’s issue-preclusion decision. The decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94350 - 2013-03-26