Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40351 - 40360 of 58542 for speedy trial.

[PDF] WI 72
court stated that if the defense were to raise the issue at trial, it "believes" the State's burden
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33225 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Following a trial, the circuit court upheld the assessments and dismissed the claims. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300445 - 2020-10-29

Michael J. Koffman v. Jeremy J. Leichtfuss
., New Richmond, on behalf of the Wisconsin Academy of Trial Lawyers. 2001 WI 111 NOTICE This opinion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17482 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
was entitled to a new trial because the special verdict form was improper; and (5) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94403 - 2013-03-20

2010 WI APP 116
] We conclude that the trial court erred by granting summary judgment to American Family. We therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52715 - 2010-08-24

Robert Hoskins v. Dodge County
County and the City of Beaver Dam. Hoskins claims the trial court erred in concluding that the County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3773 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 8, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
was not a party. Welton’s counsel in this case moved to adjourn the scheduled trial until after the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28070 - 2007-02-07

State v. Eugene Huntington
testified at trial about her examination of Jeri. McCormick repeated her initial conversations with Bell
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17124 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Luther Williams
indicated. No. 00-3065-CR 3 ¶4 At the trial on these charges, the State introduced
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16440 - 2017-09-21

2009 WI APP 81
LUNDSTEN, J. Michael Sveum challenges his aggravated stalking conviction. At Sveum’s jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36414 - 2009-06-29