Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40391 - 40400 of 83320 for case search.
Search results 40391 - 40400 of 83320 for case search.
Mary Jane Lenhardt v. William John Lenhardt
in family law cases, including cases involving maintenance.[1] Whitford, 232 Wis. 2d 38, ¶¶7, 8. Equitable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21388 - 2006-02-14
in family law cases, including cases involving maintenance.[1] Whitford, 232 Wis. 2d 38, ¶¶7, 8. Equitable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21388 - 2006-02-14
[PDF]
Clayton Ganser v. Claudia Schwartz
the option void and dismissing Ganser’s complaint. The court later entered a final order in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12757 - 2017-09-21
the option void and dismissing Ganser’s complaint. The court later entered a final order in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12757 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Gregg A. Pfaff
in this case, Gregg A. Pfaff, was also arrested for a felony—homicide by intoxicated use of a motor vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5407 - 2017-09-19
in this case, Gregg A. Pfaff, was also arrested for a felony—homicide by intoxicated use of a motor vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5407 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
in a separate case, were dismissed and read in for sentencing purposes.[4] ¶4 At the plea hearing, trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57466 - 2010-12-06
in a separate case, were dismissed and read in for sentencing purposes.[4] ¶4 At the plea hearing, trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57466 - 2010-12-06
COURT OF APPEALS
for reconsideration and suppressed the evidence. The court reasoned Bohman had “some impact” on this case because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106915 - 2014-01-21
for reconsideration and suppressed the evidence. The court reasoned Bohman had “some impact” on this case because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106915 - 2014-01-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the residual hearsay exception, WIS. STAT. § 908.03(24). Therefore, we summarily affirm. This case arose
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970274 - 2025-06-17
the residual hearsay exception, WIS. STAT. § 908.03(24). Therefore, we summarily affirm. This case arose
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970274 - 2025-06-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-acts evidence given the greater latitude rule applicable in child sexual assault cases. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=635941 - 2023-03-22
-acts evidence given the greater latitude rule applicable in child sexual assault cases. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=635941 - 2023-03-22
State v. Richard C. Wos
further testified that at the close of the case, he told his trial counsel that “the jury had a right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2582 - 2005-03-31
further testified that at the close of the case, he told his trial counsel that “the jury had a right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2582 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of a child under the age of thirteen, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 948.025(1).[2] The victim in both cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67971 - 2011-07-13
of a child under the age of thirteen, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 948.025(1).[2] The victim in both cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67971 - 2011-07-13
Dawn Alt v. Richard S. Cline, M.D.
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 96-3356, 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11841 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 96-3356, 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11841 - 2005-03-31