Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4041 - 4050 of 82690 for case code.
Search results 4041 - 4050 of 82690 for case code.
[PDF]
Supreme Court rule petition memo 17-03
by supreme court order, today’s statute remains nearly identical to the 1849 Field Code. 4 In 1971
/supreme/docs/1703memo.pdf - 2017-03-17
by supreme court order, today’s statute remains nearly identical to the 1849 Field Code. 4 In 1971
/supreme/docs/1703memo.pdf - 2017-03-17
[PDF]
Mary Scheuermann v. Karen Cigan
statement accounting for withholding the security deposit. See WIS. ADMIN. CODE § ATCP 134.06(4)(a).2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6438 - 2017-09-19
statement accounting for withholding the security deposit. See WIS. ADMIN. CODE § ATCP 134.06(4)(a).2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6438 - 2017-09-19
City of New Berlin v. Kenneth Pollich
of New Berlin, Wis., Municipal Code § 9.15, designated “Destruction of Property Prohibited.” Pollich
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8761 - 2005-03-31
of New Berlin, Wis., Municipal Code § 9.15, designated “Destruction of Property Prohibited.” Pollich
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8761 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Nathaniel Allen Lindell v. Jon E. Litscher
by WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DOC 303.76(1). The respondents claim Lindell was given a form, known as DOC-71
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6556 - 2017-09-19
by WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DOC 303.76(1). The respondents claim Lindell was given a form, known as DOC-71
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6556 - 2017-09-19
City of Wautoma v. David H. Jansen
of the Wautoma city ordinances. He argues that: (1) his case was illegally tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9249 - 2005-03-31
of the Wautoma city ordinances. He argues that: (1) his case was illegally tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9249 - 2005-03-31
State v. William W. Gandt
a case that discusses public policy concerns based on the administrative code regarding employment issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10434 - 2005-03-31
a case that discusses public policy concerns based on the administrative code regarding employment issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10434 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Wautoma v. David H. Jansen
ordinances. He argues that: (1) his case was illegally tried to a jury; (2) he was denied due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9249 - 2017-09-19
ordinances. He argues that: (1) his case was illegally tried to a jury; (2) he was denied due process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9249 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
court for Waukesha County: KATHRYN W. FOSTER, Judge. Reversed. ¶1 BROWN, C.J.1 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30622 - 2014-09-15
court for Waukesha County: KATHRYN W. FOSTER, Judge. Reversed. ¶1 BROWN, C.J.1 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30622 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. William W. Gandt
proposition. He cites instead a case that discusses public policy concerns based on the administrative code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10434 - 2017-09-20
proposition. He cites instead a case that discusses public policy concerns based on the administrative code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10434 - 2017-09-20
Wisconsin Court System - Directories
justices Calendar Livestream courts Famous cases Visiting Court of Appeals Function Fees & filing Judges
/contact/directories.htm - 2026-02-07
justices Calendar Livestream courts Famous cases Visiting Court of Appeals Function Fees & filing Judges
/contact/directories.htm - 2026-02-07