Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40411 - 40420 of 46967 for show's.

2009 WI APP 177
, 434 N.W.2d 609 (1989). First, a defendant must show the existence of a new factor thought to justify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43013 - 2009-12-15

[PDF] NOTICE
“February 13th” e-mail message showing “an out-of-office reply” from the social worker. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57584 - 2014-09-15

CA Blank Order
primary sentencing objectives were “community protection and punishment” and that Gordon’s history showed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112883 - 2014-05-27

State v. Raymond D. Shaw
together at Shaw’s apartment that he shared with his girlfriend. While at the apartment, White showed up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11726 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
by the [trial] court, the defendant has the burden to show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33761 - 2008-08-18

COURT OF APPEALS
277. Accordingly, Bland shows no basis for suppressing the evidence discovered during the search.[4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91694 - 2013-01-22

CA Blank Order
either show that the plea colloquy was defective and the defendant did not understand information
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120639 - 2014-09-02

COURT OF APPEALS
reliance on the 25-year mandatory minimum confinement provision and to enter a judgment showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71521 - 2011-09-28

Pekin Insurance Company v. H. Fuller & Sons, Inc.
that the evidence shows that the Fullers did not have a proper motive when they declined to pay the premiums owed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8383 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
plea after sentencing if he can show refusal to allow the withdrawal would work a manifest injustice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119619 - 2014-08-18