Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40451 - 40460 of 98582 for civil court case status online.
Search results 40451 - 40460 of 98582 for civil court case status online.
[PDF]
NOTICE
of § 971.11(2), the trial court has the discretion under § 971.11(7) to dismiss the case with or without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26638 - 2014-09-15
of § 971.11(2), the trial court has the discretion under § 971.11(7) to dismiss the case with or without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26638 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of briefing, George filed a motion to remand the case to the circuit court. That motion is denied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156354 - 2017-09-21
of briefing, George filed a motion to remand the case to the circuit court. That motion is denied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156354 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Liduvina Stensland v. Warshafsky
Steven’s case proceeded to trial. Following extensive testimony, the trial court granted Safeway’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3485 - 2017-09-20
Steven’s case proceeded to trial. Following extensive testimony, the trial court granted Safeway’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3485 - 2017-09-20
Liduvina Stensland v. Warshafsky
to apply issue preclusion to this case.” Accordingly, the circuit court correctly ruled that issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3485 - 2015-04-05
to apply issue preclusion to this case.” Accordingly, the circuit court correctly ruled that issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3485 - 2015-04-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
reasons. First, she never argued to the family court that this was a spousal support case rather than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34980 - 2014-09-15
reasons. First, she never argued to the family court that this was a spousal support case rather than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34980 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
on collateral review. Therefore, we affirm. ¶2 In Milwaukee County Circuit Court Case No. 2003CF1882
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34398 - 2014-09-15
on collateral review. Therefore, we affirm. ¶2 In Milwaukee County Circuit Court Case No. 2003CF1882
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34398 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2021 WI 41 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2019AP2073
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=365494 - 2021-05-07
2021 WI 41 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2019AP2073
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=365494 - 2021-05-07
2006 WI APP 200
2006 WI App 200 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 2004AP3236
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26469 - 2006-10-30
2006 WI App 200 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 2004AP3236
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26469 - 2006-10-30
[MS WORD]
GF-247A: Motion to Seal or Redact a Transcript
1 Enter the name of the county in which this case is filed. STATE OF WISCONSIN, CIRCUIT COURT
/formdisplay/GF-247A.doc?formNumber=GF-247A&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-03-04
1 Enter the name of the county in which this case is filed. STATE OF WISCONSIN, CIRCUIT COURT
/formdisplay/GF-247A.doc?formNumber=GF-247A&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-03-04
M. Susan Churchill v. WFA Econometrics Corporation
2002 WI App 305 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 02-0348 & 02-0523
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4916 - 2005-03-31
2002 WI App 305 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case Nos.: 02-0348 & 02-0523
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4916 - 2005-03-31