Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40451 - 40460 of 68274 for did.
Search results 40451 - 40460 of 68274 for did.
[PDF]
NOTICE
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 980.01(6)(a) (1995-96), and did not require him to register as a sex offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33698 - 2014-09-15
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 980.01(6)(a) (1995-96), and did not require him to register as a sex offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33698 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
hearing. The court did not award Henry lost income for attending the March restitution hearing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718811 - 2023-10-24
hearing. The court did not award Henry lost income for attending the March restitution hearing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718811 - 2023-10-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. § 971.11,2 contends the court did not appropriately exercise its discretion when determining whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983337 - 2025-07-16
. § 971.11,2 contends the court did not appropriately exercise its discretion when determining whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983337 - 2025-07-16
COURT OF APPEALS
countered that the deed did not specify the property was donated for a special purpose. It argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34045 - 2008-09-15
countered that the deed did not specify the property was donated for a special purpose. It argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34045 - 2008-09-15
Margaret Laubert v. Michael G. Mallek
therefore existed. ¶11 Mallek contends that an enforceable contract did not exist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17961 - 2005-05-03
therefore existed. ¶11 Mallek contends that an enforceable contract did not exist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17961 - 2005-05-03
COURT OF APPEALS
of the victim; and (2) that the person did so intentionally. See Wis. Stat. § 940.01(1) (2011-12).[1] A person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117569 - 2014-07-21
of the victim; and (2) that the person did so intentionally. See Wis. Stat. § 940.01(1) (2011-12).[1] A person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117569 - 2014-07-21
Lucy A. Goebel v. Henry S. Goebel
by the Court.” ¶5 Henry did not make any of the payments ordered in the judgment. After a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15137 - 2005-03-31
by the Court.” ¶5 Henry did not make any of the payments ordered in the judgment. After a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15137 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Faith Olson v. Terry Olson
it did not look at the reasonableness of her decision to terminate her employment in light of her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8529 - 2017-09-19
it did not look at the reasonableness of her decision to terminate her employment in light of her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8529 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
), to which Lewis did not respond. Observing that the no-merit report discussed only potential sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218754 - 2018-09-12
), to which Lewis did not respond. Observing that the no-merit report discussed only potential sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218754 - 2018-09-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
attack on his convictions because this court did not address his current claims in Williams II. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92146 - 2014-09-15
attack on his convictions because this court did not address his current claims in Williams II. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92146 - 2014-09-15