Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40481 - 40490 of 61897 for does.
Search results 40481 - 40490 of 61897 for does.
[PDF]
Court system 2021-2022 expenditures
expenditures that the state does not cover. The counties receive help in the form of pass-through funds from
/courts/overview/docs/expenditures21-22.pdf - 2022-11-09
expenditures that the state does not cover. The counties receive help in the form of pass-through funds from
/courts/overview/docs/expenditures21-22.pdf - 2022-11-09
[PDF]
Court system expenditures 20-21
circuit court expenditures that the state does not cover. The counties receive help in the form of pass
/courts/overview/docs/expenditures20-21.pdf - 2022-03-01
circuit court expenditures that the state does not cover. The counties receive help in the form of pass
/courts/overview/docs/expenditures20-21.pdf - 2022-03-01
[PDF]
Court system 2022-2023 expenditures
expenditures that the state does not cover. The counties receive help in the form of pass-through funds from
/courts/overview/docs/expenditures22-23.pdf - 2024-01-30
expenditures that the state does not cover. The counties receive help in the form of pass-through funds from
/courts/overview/docs/expenditures22-23.pdf - 2024-01-30
[PDF]
Amended: May 29, 2025
2024AP001399 Timothy David Reeves v. Moondette Moscoso Reeves 2024AP001459 Jane Doe v. Jay C. Lick, D.O
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=964176 - 2025-05-28
2024AP001399 Timothy David Reeves v. Moondette Moscoso Reeves 2024AP001459 Jane Doe v. Jay C. Lick, D.O
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=964176 - 2025-05-28
[PDF]
Court system 2024-2025 expenditures
expenditures that the state does not cover. The counties receive WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT, 16 EAST STATE
/courts/overview/docs/expenditures24-25.pdf - 2025-10-30
expenditures that the state does not cover. The counties receive WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT, 16 EAST STATE
/courts/overview/docs/expenditures24-25.pdf - 2025-10-30
State v. Derrick Stewart
does not require a new trial. Courts will not grant a new trial for Brady evidence unless it would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11970 - 2005-03-31
does not require a new trial. Courts will not grant a new trial for Brady evidence unless it would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11970 - 2005-03-31
Stratford Area Fire Department v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
)(b) gives LIRC discretion to issue interlocutory orders and does not restrict the type of order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2475 - 2005-03-31
)(b) gives LIRC discretion to issue interlocutory orders and does not restrict the type of order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2475 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David L. Canedy
motion"). 2 Canedy does not argue that because Escalona was decided after his motion, he need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7724 - 2017-09-19
motion"). 2 Canedy does not argue that because Escalona was decided after his motion, he need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7724 - 2017-09-19
[MS WORD]
CR-238: Order for Supervised Release Plan or Community Placement Report
not meet the treatment needs of the individual. |_| the residential option in the Plan does not meet
/formdisplay/CR-238.doc?formNumber=CR-238&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2020-12-01
not meet the treatment needs of the individual. |_| the residential option in the Plan does not meet
/formdisplay/CR-238.doc?formNumber=CR-238&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2020-12-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
)(c). This failure does not present a potentially meritorious issue for appeal, however
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261903 - 2020-05-27
)(c). This failure does not present a potentially meritorious issue for appeal, however
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261903 - 2020-05-27