Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40481 - 40490 of 60141 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 40481 - 40490 of 60141 for quit claim deed/1000.
State v. Douglas Peter Ikeler
On appeal, Ikeler seeks sentence modification, claiming that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20797 - 2005-12-27
On appeal, Ikeler seeks sentence modification, claiming that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20797 - 2005-12-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
“Karl’s Garage” was nearby. She claimed Williams’s vehicle had gotten stuck in the mud as they tried
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=816798 - 2024-06-26
“Karl’s Garage” was nearby. She claimed Williams’s vehicle had gotten stuck in the mud as they tried
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=816798 - 2024-06-26
Village of Fontana v. Gary M. Zamecnik
, Zamecnik claimed that he never gave Miller Carroll permission to enter into this plea agreement nor was he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4602 - 2005-03-31
, Zamecnik claimed that he never gave Miller Carroll permission to enter into this plea agreement nor was he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4602 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
already paid, claiming an erroneous exercise of discretion by the sentencing court. The court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49478 - 2010-05-03
already paid, claiming an erroneous exercise of discretion by the sentencing court. The court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49478 - 2010-05-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or no-contest pleas.6 Thus, we agree with appellate counsel that there is no arguable merit to a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=834666 - 2024-08-06
or no-contest pleas.6 Thus, we agree with appellate counsel that there is no arguable merit to a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=834666 - 2024-08-06
State v. Darrick Wright
weapon. ¶4 Wright filed a motion to suppress, claiming the officers lacked reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6067 - 2005-03-31
weapon. ¶4 Wright filed a motion to suppress, claiming the officers lacked reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6067 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
video recording, if any, within the context of Rupar’s mistrial claim. No. 2012AP801-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96867 - 2014-09-15
video recording, if any, within the context of Rupar’s mistrial claim. No. 2012AP801-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96867 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
] and would have insisted on going to trial.” Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985). Backman claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210424 - 2018-04-03
] and would have insisted on going to trial.” Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985). Backman claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210424 - 2018-04-03
Clark Anderson v. State
. In support of his claim, Anderson submitted a WC-16-B form from Dr. Czaplicki which was received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8905 - 2005-03-31
. In support of his claim, Anderson submitted a WC-16-B form from Dr. Czaplicki which was received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8905 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lynn M. Sura v. Franklin J. Sura
. ¶10 Franklin complains that the court did not give its reasons for rejecting his claims that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15703 - 2017-09-21
. ¶10 Franklin complains that the court did not give its reasons for rejecting his claims that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15703 - 2017-09-21