Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40491 - 40500 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 40491 - 40500 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
commenced a collection action. 1 The circuit court denied Denis’s motion to dismiss, and subsequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110490 - 2017-09-21
commenced a collection action. 1 The circuit court denied Denis’s motion to dismiss, and subsequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110490 - 2017-09-21
State v. Donald Sherman
denied his motion to suppress the State’s evidence. The issue is whether the trial court properly ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15320 - 2005-03-31
denied his motion to suppress the State’s evidence. The issue is whether the trial court properly ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15320 - 2005-03-31
State v. David J. Pizzini
denying their motion to dismiss charges against them on double jeopardy grounds. We grant the petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14036 - 2005-03-31
denying their motion to dismiss charges against them on double jeopardy grounds. We grant the petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14036 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Candace I. Sedgwick v. Dawn L. Volenec
This is a personal injury case. Defendants moved to compel production of the diary during discovery. The motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4955 - 2017-09-19
This is a personal injury case. Defendants moved to compel production of the diary during discovery. The motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4955 - 2017-09-19
Candace I. Sedgwick v. Dawn L. Volenec
production of the diary during discovery. The motion was accompanied by an affidavit of defendants’ counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4955 - 2005-03-31
production of the diary during discovery. The motion was accompanied by an affidavit of defendants’ counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4955 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Rolando Balli
court granted the State’s motion and then denied Balli’s oral motion to dismiss the criminal complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7024 - 2017-09-20
court granted the State’s motion and then denied Balli’s oral motion to dismiss the criminal complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7024 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
a postconviction motion seeking that relief, not a no-merit appeal. If Barker chooses not to seek plea withdrawal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108237 - 2014-02-17
a postconviction motion seeking that relief, not a no-merit appeal. If Barker chooses not to seek plea withdrawal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108237 - 2014-02-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reasonable suspicion. The circuit court held an evidentiary hearing and then denied the suppression motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016603 - 2025-09-30
reasonable suspicion. The circuit court held an evidentiary hearing and then denied the suppression motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016603 - 2025-09-30
Robert C. Beese v. Lance Weirsma
that same day. Beese filed a motion for substitution of the judge on August 22, 2000, noting that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3340 - 2005-03-31
that same day. Beese filed a motion for substitution of the judge on August 22, 2000, noting that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3340 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a postconviction motion challenging the DNA surcharges within sixty days of the date of this order. Counsel may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149795 - 2017-09-21
a postconviction motion challenging the DNA surcharges within sixty days of the date of this order. Counsel may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149795 - 2017-09-21