Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4051 - 4060 of 68445 for did.
Search results 4051 - 4060 of 68445 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and Officer Yandel knocked on the door, which was answered by Matalonis, who was out of breath, but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132150 - 2017-09-21
and Officer Yandel knocked on the door, which was answered by Matalonis, who was out of breath, but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132150 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ronald L. Ragan
that the retrial did not violate Ragan's protection against double jeopardy. Second, Ragan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10347 - 2005-03-31
that the retrial did not violate Ragan's protection against double jeopardy. Second, Ragan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10347 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
on collateral review that he did not raise in a prior postconviction proceeding or appeal, his motion brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88545 - 2012-10-23
on collateral review that he did not raise in a prior postconviction proceeding or appeal, his motion brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88545 - 2012-10-23
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
that the defendants did not receive ineffective assistance because they have failed to show prejudice as required
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17520 - 2005-03-31
that the defendants did not receive ineffective assistance because they have failed to show prejudice as required
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17520 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
that the defendants did not receive ineffective assistance because they have failed to show prejudice as required
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17517 - 2005-03-31
that the defendants did not receive ineffective assistance because they have failed to show prejudice as required
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17517 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 179
violent person. The circuit court erred because it did not make this determination but instead decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26170 - 2014-09-15
violent person. The circuit court erred because it did not make this determination but instead decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26170 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 20, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of App...
because the State agreed on the record not to use Allen’s statements at trial. Trial counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100897 - 2013-08-19
because the State agreed on the record not to use Allen’s statements at trial. Trial counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100897 - 2013-08-19
State v. Gerald P.
, the trial court did not lose competency to proceed. Thus, the order is affirmed. I. Background
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20442 - 2006-02-13
, the trial court did not lose competency to proceed. Thus, the order is affirmed. I. Background
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20442 - 2006-02-13
[PDF]
David Pagel v. Robert Gaffney
and costs of the action because the No. 98-3134 and 98-3196 4 court did not explicitly rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14726 - 2017-09-21
and costs of the action because the No. 98-3134 and 98-3196 4 court did not explicitly rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14726 - 2017-09-21
David Pagel v. Robert Gaffney
the court did not explicitly rule on these items, and they may be affected by the court’s resolution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14759 - 2005-03-31
the court did not explicitly rule on these items, and they may be affected by the court’s resolution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14759 - 2005-03-31