Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40501 - 40510 of 68502 for did.
Search results 40501 - 40510 of 68502 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
countered that the deed did not specify the property was donated for a special purpose. It argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34045 - 2008-09-15
countered that the deed did not specify the property was donated for a special purpose. It argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34045 - 2008-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
No. 2019AP571-CRNM 5 to be associated with the judge’s comment that she did not usually accept
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246494 - 2019-09-06
No. 2019AP571-CRNM 5 to be associated with the judge’s comment that she did not usually accept
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246494 - 2019-09-06
[PDF]
David K. Kalan v. City of St. Francis
that the stipulation settling the City's circuit court case did not apply to the appeal and that the two cases were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8726 - 2017-09-19
that the stipulation settling the City's circuit court case did not apply to the appeal and that the two cases were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8726 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, Mark concedes that he did not then submit full exhaustion No. 2014AP1111 5
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154941 - 2017-09-21
, Mark concedes that he did not then submit full exhaustion No. 2014AP1111 5
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154941 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Nicholas Christman v. Michael Galanton
of Magnuson’s conduct, that staff did nothing to prevent such conduct, that staff conspired to protect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6105 - 2017-09-19
of Magnuson’s conduct, that staff did nothing to prevent such conduct, that staff conspired to protect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6105 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
[]tailored to their statutory purpose;” (2) the conditions “did not take into account D.S.’[s] specific
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156985 - 2017-09-21
[]tailored to their statutory purpose;” (2) the conditions “did not take into account D.S.’[s] specific
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156985 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Patricia Wathen v. Robert Moore
the status quo, did not exceed its discretion in the matter. ¶10 Moore waived his challenge to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2641 - 2017-09-19
the status quo, did not exceed its discretion in the matter. ¶10 Moore waived his challenge to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2641 - 2017-09-19
State v. James Brownson
on a signature bond. Brownson did not pursue postconviction relief until he filed a motion on April 25, 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2444 - 2005-03-31
on a signature bond. Brownson did not pursue postconviction relief until he filed a motion on April 25, 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2444 - 2005-03-31
State v. Willie F. Hannah
hearing. Hannah filed a postconviction motion alleging that because the trial court did not consult
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12912 - 2005-03-31
hearing. Hannah filed a postconviction motion alleging that because the trial court did not consult
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12912 - 2005-03-31
State v. Melvin Beasley
] constitutes a new factor, justifying sentence modification. Because the trial court did not rely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8471 - 2005-03-31
] constitutes a new factor, justifying sentence modification. Because the trial court did not rely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8471 - 2005-03-31