Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40531 - 40540 of 63760 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 40531 - 40540 of 63760 for Motion for joint custody.
Melvina Young v. John S. Wright
against them in their efforts to rent an apartment from him. In a pretrial motion, Wright moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10661 - 2005-03-31
against them in their efforts to rent an apartment from him. In a pretrial motion, Wright moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10661 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
appeals from a circuit court order denying his motion for sentence modification. Based upon our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054558 - 2025-12-23
appeals from a circuit court order denying his motion for sentence modification. Based upon our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054558 - 2025-12-23
State v. Eugene Nichols
an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. We affirm. ¶2 Nichols was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14094 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. We affirm. ¶2 Nichols was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14094 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Rachel Myers v. Carrie A. Ryan
’ motion for summary judgment that a three-year statute of limitations barred the action. We reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24561 - 2017-09-21
’ motion for summary judgment that a three-year statute of limitations barred the action. We reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24561 - 2017-09-21
Pierce County v. Amy F.
Amy’s motion. The court concluded that because Amy had the statutorily prescribed notices through
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7551 - 2005-03-31
Amy’s motion. The court concluded that because Amy had the statutorily prescribed notices through
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7551 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Richard T. Peffer
probable cause to arrest him and, therefore, that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2188 - 2017-09-19
probable cause to arrest him and, therefore, that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2188 - 2017-09-19
State v. Colin N. Gelford
an order denying his motion to withdraw his no contest “Alford pleas”[1] to two counts of sexual contact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14072 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his motion to withdraw his no contest “Alford pleas”[1] to two counts of sexual contact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14072 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
, on the basis of claim preclusion. Following briefing and argument, the circuit court granted Flynn’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069331 - 2026-01-28
, on the basis of claim preclusion. Following briefing and argument, the circuit court granted Flynn’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069331 - 2026-01-28
COURT OF APPEALS
and an order denying his postconviction motion. He asserts the evidence was insufficient to support his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70353 - 2011-08-29
and an order denying his postconviction motion. He asserts the evidence was insufficient to support his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70353 - 2011-08-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing. Singleton contends that the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109618 - 2017-09-21
an order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing. Singleton contends that the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109618 - 2017-09-21