Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40541 - 40550 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 40541 - 40550 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
amount of $1,530.25. On this court’s own motion, this appeal is disposed of summarily pursuant to WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=914056 - 2025-02-13
amount of $1,530.25. On this court’s own motion, this appeal is disposed of summarily pursuant to WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=914056 - 2025-02-13
COURT OF APPEALS
his sentence modification motion. The issue is whether the presumptive mandatory release statute, Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33526 - 2008-07-30
his sentence modification motion. The issue is whether the presumptive mandatory release statute, Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33526 - 2008-07-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and run involving death. He also appeals from the postconviction order denying his motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=531604 - 2022-06-21
and run involving death. He also appeals from the postconviction order denying his motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=531604 - 2022-06-21
State v. Jason R. Dodd
motion seeking to suppress the showup identification. Because the trial court did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24678 - 2006-04-03
motion seeking to suppress the showup identification. Because the trial court did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24678 - 2006-04-03
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
conviction, and orders denying motions for sentence modification in each case. We affirm for the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26847 - 2006-10-18
conviction, and orders denying motions for sentence modification in each case. We affirm for the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26847 - 2006-10-18
[PDF]
State v. Robert John Kotz
, the trial court inquired whether defense counsel had any motions. Defense counsel moved for mistrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10856 - 2017-09-20
, the trial court inquired whether defense counsel had any motions. Defense counsel moved for mistrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10856 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶3 Jackson’s motion alleged the victim’s actions involving the unrelated incident were admissible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176949 - 2017-09-21
. ¶3 Jackson’s motion alleged the victim’s actions involving the unrelated incident were admissible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176949 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a felony. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Moore argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677085 - 2023-07-11
of a felony. He also appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Moore argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677085 - 2023-07-11
[PDF]
Eau Claire County v. Craig M. Mader
him. No. 2004AP3035 3 ¶4 After Mader was charged with OWI, he filed a motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18255 - 2017-09-21
him. No. 2004AP3035 3 ¶4 After Mader was charged with OWI, he filed a motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18255 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Elizabeth Grissmeyer v. Spiegelhoff's Super Foods Market, Inc.
it had run on the correct date. ¶3 The respondents brought a motion for summary judgment asserting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15487 - 2017-09-21
it had run on the correct date. ¶3 The respondents brought a motion for summary judgment asserting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15487 - 2017-09-21