Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40541 - 40550 of 44261 for name change.

2010 WI APP 9
, is ambiguous, we resort to extrinsic sources, namely, the statute’s legislative history.[4] See Kalal, 271 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44174 - 2011-02-07

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to a resentencing hearing because he has identified a “new factor,” namely, the alleged “absence of any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98604 - 2014-09-15

State v. Linda A.W.
presciently focused on what it appropriately saw as the “key factor”—namely: “Whether the child will be able
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4654 - 2005-03-31

James N. Elliott v. Michael L. Morgan
the dismissal on the grounds that Elliott failed to join indispensable parties, namely the BID and MRD. Elliott
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11058 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
after service of the notice. The board shall certify the names of all lawyers so suspended under
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261910 - 2020-06-12

[PDF] WI APP 87
because she purchased it before the conduct underlying his conviction—namely, the August 5, 2014
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176946 - 2017-09-21

Mary Anne Hedrich v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
of the party to be named as respondent. No time period specified under s. 227.49(1) for filing a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2843 - 2005-03-31

WI App 101 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP1399-CR Complete Ti...
submitted by Benson for sentencing identifies Ambien as a brand name for zolpidem. For simplicity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85654 - 2012-09-26

[PDF] Richland County v. P.G. Miron Company, Inc.
, the complaint named the project architect and a swimming pool contractor as defendants. No. 97-1769
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12639 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
. The court reasoned that a “judge’s mother has an interest in the case, namely her familial relationship
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70381 - 2011-08-29