Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40541 - 40550 of 60151 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 40541 - 40550 of 60151 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion. He claims the court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion “by failing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=674613 - 2023-07-05
postconviction motion. He claims the court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion “by failing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=674613 - 2023-07-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in default for failure to appear except that pleadings asserting new or additional claims for relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145095 - 2017-09-21
in default for failure to appear except that pleadings asserting new or additional claims for relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145095 - 2017-09-21
State v. Mark T. Smith
-examination, Smith claimed that he behaved peacefully during his morning visit to his mother’s home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21029 - 2006-01-23
-examination, Smith claimed that he behaved peacefully during his morning visit to his mother’s home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21029 - 2006-01-23
[PDF]
State v. Ramon Sanchez-Diaz
court so that he could file a motion claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. We denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16210 - 2017-09-21
court so that he could file a motion claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. We denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16210 - 2017-09-21
State v. Wandell Lee
rejected as untimely Lee’s claim of erroneous exercise of discretion. Lee moved for reconsideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26213 - 2006-08-14
rejected as untimely Lee’s claim of erroneous exercise of discretion. Lee moved for reconsideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26213 - 2006-08-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the issue and Boyer follows up in his reply brief, we deem the claim abandoned. See State v. Chu, 2002 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149022 - 2017-09-21
the issue and Boyer follows up in his reply brief, we deem the claim abandoned. See State v. Chu, 2002 WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149022 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
claims there was no connection between him and the Escort. While Meves did not know whether Watters had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50756 - 2010-06-07
claims there was no connection between him and the Escort. While Meves did not know whether Watters had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50756 - 2010-06-07
CA Blank Order
omitted). We reject Amerstate’s due process claims. Amerstate was afforded a full opportunity
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128512 - 2014-11-18
omitted). We reject Amerstate’s due process claims. Amerstate was afforded a full opportunity
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=128512 - 2014-11-18
State v. Justin I. Peck
to suppress the marijuana and pipe, claiming that the search was invalid. He argued that Merrill violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16048 - 2005-03-31
to suppress the marijuana and pipe, claiming that the search was invalid. He argued that Merrill violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16048 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
reject Brown’s claim with respect to the time-frame element. The State, however, concedes the colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84074 - 2012-06-25
reject Brown’s claim with respect to the time-frame element. The State, however, concedes the colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84074 - 2012-06-25