Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40551 - 40560 of 59373 for do.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that we do not “blindside [circuit] courts with reversals based on theories which did not originate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717850 - 2023-10-24

[PDF] CA Blank Order
failed to do so. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=476965 - 2022-01-25

[PDF] City of Wautoma v. David H. Jansen
§ 346.57(5), exceeding zoned or posted limits. We do not consider arguments raised for the first time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9249 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
4 imprisonment, fully explaining its rationale for doing so. Under these circumstances
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175377 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
…. …. … [I]f a court determines that the facts do not constitute a new factor as a matter of law, “it need
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=621919 - 2023-02-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
conclude that the circuit court did not err, we do not address Benson’s other claims. By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149311 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Frank Geiger v. Eastern Wisconsin Stock Car Association
. Geiger and the EWSCA do not dispute the facts germane to this case. Thus, the whole case boils down
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14835 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jeffrey A. Duerst
finds substantial reason not to do so and states the reason on the record. Restitution ordered under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14957 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey A. Duerst
finds substantial reason not to do so and states the reason on the record. Restitution ordered under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14958 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
). He fails to do so. The record shows that the circuit court identified punishment as the primary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=470371 - 2022-01-11