Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40561 - 40570 of 83389 for simple case search.

[PDF] Schams Joint Revocable Trust by David F. Schams v. William M. Evans
in a given case. Department of Revenue v. Mark, 168 Wis.2d 288, 293 n.3, 483 N.W.2d 302, 304 (Ct. App. 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14841 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Perry E. Blanks
of the present case; (3) that the prior act is clearly relevant to a material issue; (4) that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8628 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
in the case; (4) the evidence is not merely cumulative to the testimony introduced at trial; and (5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55817 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
confinement pursuant to § 302.11(1g) is a new factor in this case. We disagree. ¶7 WISCONSIN STAT. § 302.11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97905 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Johnny M. McAdoo
the penalty enhancers were properly applied in this case. We affirm in part and reverse in part. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24926 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
inculpatory statements to police and did not take his case to trial even though Green had a viable defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171869 - 2017-09-21

State v. Bryon P. Cibrario
on the sentencing aspects of the case, but the plea agreement contained no sentencing concessions by the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26279 - 2006-08-22

Land Title Services, Inc. v. Donald W. Kemnitz, Jr.
: Title insurance companies never win these cases; they always lose. They are the big pots of gold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5245 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
case or in his postconviction motions, Crouthers explained that he did not see a “need to bring that up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73388 - 2011-11-07

Dane County Department of Human Services v. Thomas M.
, Stats. Nos. 99-0259 and 99-0260 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15067 - 2005-03-31