Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40561 - 40570 of 83395 for simple case search.

COURT OF APPEALS
prior approval for any future filings, on a case-by-case basis, so as to prevent additional frivolous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80439 - 2012-04-04

[PDF] State v. Perry E. Blanks
of the present case; (3) that the prior act is clearly relevant to a material issue; (4) that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8628 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
in the case; (4) the evidence is not merely cumulative to the testimony introduced at trial; and (5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55817 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
confinement pursuant to § 302.11(1g) is a new factor in this case. We disagree. ¶7 WISCONSIN STAT. § 302.11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97905 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
inculpatory statements to police and did not take his case to trial even though Green had a viable defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171869 - 2017-09-21

State v. Bryon P. Cibrario
on the sentencing aspects of the case, but the plea agreement contained no sentencing concessions by the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26279 - 2006-08-22

Land Title Services, Inc. v. Donald W. Kemnitz, Jr.
: Title insurance companies never win these cases; they always lose. They are the big pots of gold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5245 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Winnebago County v. Travis G. Lankford
erred when it barred him from introducing evidence that the Intoximeter used in this case had failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7557 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Graddie Jude v. Allied Insurance Center, Inc.
be addressed). The doctrine of accord and satisfaction applies in this case, which operates to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12987 - 2017-09-21

State v. Wallace J. Hammerle
the prosecutor. Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 86 (1963). In this case, the undisclosed exculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6230 - 2005-03-31