Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40571 - 40580 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 40571 - 40580 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Robert F. Pagac
that the trial court should have granted his motion to suppress evidence derived from what Pagac contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4997 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court should have granted his motion to suppress evidence derived from what Pagac contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4997 - 2005-03-31
State v. Alexis C.
for the illegal possession of marijuana. He claims that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2489 - 2005-03-31
for the illegal possession of marijuana. He claims that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2489 - 2005-03-31
State v. Willie M. Thomas
and, therefore, that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence seized following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2570 - 2005-03-31
and, therefore, that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the evidence seized following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2570 - 2005-03-31
State v. Randy O. Bohardt
with respect to the trial court's pretrial ruling denying Bohardt's motion for production for in camera
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10630 - 2005-03-31
with respect to the trial court's pretrial ruling denying Bohardt's motion for production for in camera
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10630 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard W. Foelker
the motion and a postconviction motion seeking relief on the same grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10528 - 2005-03-31
the motion and a postconviction motion seeking relief on the same grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10528 - 2005-03-31
State v. Keith D. Heacox
care pursuant to Wis. Stat. ch. 980,[1] and an order denying his motion for post-trial relief. Heacox
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3988 - 2005-03-31
care pursuant to Wis. Stat. ch. 980,[1] and an order denying his motion for post-trial relief. Heacox
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3988 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Duerst
appeals an order denying his motions to set aside or modify a restitution order. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14958 - 2017-09-21
appeals an order denying his motions to set aside or modify a restitution order. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14958 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
ordering him to pay $5,440.60 in restitution and an order denying his postconviction motion challenging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28317 - 2014-09-15
ordering him to pay $5,440.60 in restitution and an order denying his postconviction motion challenging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28317 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Antigo Homes, Inc. v. John K. Raimer
their counterclaim, they also filed a motion for change of venue. The clerk’s minutes state, “Per Judge Jansen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7229 - 2017-09-20
their counterclaim, they also filed a motion for change of venue. The clerk’s minutes state, “Per Judge Jansen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7229 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
by denying his suppression motion because the officer lacked probable cause or reasonable suspicion to stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82866 - 2012-05-21
by denying his suppression motion because the officer lacked probable cause or reasonable suspicion to stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82866 - 2012-05-21