Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40571 - 40580 of 61895 for does.
Search results 40571 - 40580 of 61895 for does.
[PDF]
State v. Michael Storzer
does not constitute a new factor justifying a sentence reduction. A new factor is “a fact or set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2393 - 2017-09-19
does not constitute a new factor justifying a sentence reduction. A new factor is “a fact or set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2393 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Angelo J. Capriotti
does not, by itself, constitute a seizure. State v. Williams, 2002 WI 94, ¶22, 255 Wis. 2d 1, 646
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20009 - 2017-09-21
does not, by itself, constitute a seizure. State v. Williams, 2002 WI 94, ¶22, 255 Wis. 2d 1, 646
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20009 - 2017-09-21
State v. James L. Anderson
this court that Anderson does not challenge his plea, but requests review on whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10031 - 2005-03-31
this court that Anderson does not challenge his plea, but requests review on whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10031 - 2005-03-31
Mildred Plisch v. Wisconsin Department of Health & Family Services
tells how an individual is removed from the waiting list. It does not specify any particular time when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4433 - 2005-03-31
tells how an individual is removed from the waiting list. It does not specify any particular time when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4433 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christopher A. Wolter
the person on probation…. This paragraph does not apply if the conviction is for any violation under s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15984 - 2005-03-31
the person on probation…. This paragraph does not apply if the conviction is for any violation under s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15984 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael Storzer
for placement in the Wisconsin Resource Center does not constitute a new factor justifying a sentence reduction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2393 - 2005-03-31
for placement in the Wisconsin Resource Center does not constitute a new factor justifying a sentence reduction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2393 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
supervision.[2] An appeal from a judgment imposing sentence after probation revocation does not bring
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130018 - 2014-11-24
supervision.[2] An appeal from a judgment imposing sentence after probation revocation does not bring
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130018 - 2014-11-24
COURT OF APPEALS
. Brisco’s choice in this regard is indicative of the fact that such evidence does not tend to show that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81381 - 2012-04-23
. Brisco’s choice in this regard is indicative of the fact that such evidence does not tend to show that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81381 - 2012-04-23
COURT OF APPEALS
that the other does not. Blockburger v. U.S., 284 U.S. 299, 304 (1932). This “elements only test” is a purely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30122 - 2007-08-29
that the other does not. Blockburger v. U.S., 284 U.S. 299, 304 (1932). This “elements only test” is a purely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30122 - 2007-08-29
COURT OF APPEALS
and indicated that he intended to make good on that obligation. Thus, the statute of limitations does not bar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30239 - 2007-09-12
and indicated that he intended to make good on that obligation. Thus, the statute of limitations does not bar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30239 - 2007-09-12