Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40591 - 40600 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 40591 - 40600 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Paul C. Wozny
entered against him and from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6468 - 2005-03-31
entered against him and from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6468 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mack A. Kradenych
violated Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968). The circuit court held a hearing and denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2713 - 2005-03-31
violated Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968). The circuit court held a hearing and denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2713 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on that issue. The court construed the letter as a motion for reconsideration, and the court provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107151 - 2017-09-21
on that issue. The court construed the letter as a motion for reconsideration, and the court provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107151 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert F. Pagac
. STAT. § 961.41(3g)(e). Pagac argues that the trial court should have granted his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4997 - 2017-09-19
. STAT. § 961.41(3g)(e). Pagac argues that the trial court should have granted his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4997 - 2017-09-19
State v. Richard G. Lawrence
denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Lawrence pleaded guilty to operating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3535 - 2005-03-31
denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Lawrence pleaded guilty to operating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3535 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Supreme Court denied Weczera’s petition for review. Weczera then filed a pro se postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959395 - 2025-05-28
Supreme Court denied Weczera’s petition for review. Weczera then filed a pro se postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959395 - 2025-05-28
CA Blank Order
rotation, denied Margaret’s motion to reconsider Judge Dugan’s issue-preclusion decision. The decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94350 - 2013-03-26
rotation, denied Margaret’s motion to reconsider Judge Dugan’s issue-preclusion decision. The decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94350 - 2013-03-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of institutional concern for the court, and because Bunch raised the issue promptly in a postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1097145 - 2026-03-31
of institutional concern for the court, and because Bunch raised the issue promptly in a postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1097145 - 2026-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erred by denying his suppression motion because the officer lacked reasonable suspicion to stop his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106091 - 2017-09-21
erred by denying his suppression motion because the officer lacked reasonable suspicion to stop his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106091 - 2017-09-21
State v. Wylie McDonald, Jr.
illegally and, therefore, that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11733 - 2005-03-31
illegally and, therefore, that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence. This court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11733 - 2005-03-31