Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40591 - 40600 of 68502 for did.
Search results 40591 - 40600 of 68502 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel did challenge the Department’s reconfinement recommendation—three years and one day—as unduly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115232 - 2014-06-23
counsel did challenge the Department’s reconfinement recommendation—three years and one day—as unduly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115232 - 2014-06-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
on grounds that the testing methods and procedures did not meet provisions of the administrative code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30347 - 2014-09-15
on grounds that the testing methods and procedures did not meet provisions of the administrative code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30347 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
acknowledged that he did not consider this statutory defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63275 - 2014-09-15
acknowledged that he did not consider this statutory defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63275 - 2014-09-15
State v. Raymond T. Bradley
a man gave the money to him, but that Lester did not remember anything more about the incident. Steven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2909 - 2005-03-31
a man gave the money to him, but that Lester did not remember anything more about the incident. Steven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2909 - 2005-03-31
City of Madison v. William J. Sanders
and prejudicial, and the guilty verdict is based on insufficient evidence. We conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9007 - 2005-03-31
and prejudicial, and the guilty verdict is based on insufficient evidence. We conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9007 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
on the first phase, and does not challenge the default. Although present at the disposition phase, she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57488 - 2010-12-06
on the first phase, and does not challenge the default. Although present at the disposition phase, she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57488 - 2010-12-06
State v. Venturedyne, Ltd.
, that an oral agreement to extend the capping deadline did not occur. The testimony referred to by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4025 - 2005-03-31
, that an oral agreement to extend the capping deadline did not occur. The testimony referred to by the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4025 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gregory A. Zimdars
and asked for Zimdars’ driver’s license. Zimdars told Hetebrueg he did not have a driver’s license
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6641 - 2005-03-31
and asked for Zimdars’ driver’s license. Zimdars told Hetebrueg he did not have a driver’s license
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6641 - 2005-03-31
County of Waukesha v. Laura J. M.
concerning the commitment extension, but had not been informed of that right and did not otherwise know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19177 - 2005-08-02
concerning the commitment extension, but had not been informed of that right and did not otherwise know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19177 - 2005-08-02
COURT OF APPEALS
to the administrative suspension and thus did not make an argument on that issue. Id., ¶5. The circuit court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82231 - 2012-05-15
to the administrative suspension and thus did not make an argument on that issue. Id., ¶5. The circuit court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82231 - 2012-05-15