Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4061 - 4070 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 4061 - 4070 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Marquel A. Harris appeals from an order denying his motion to modify a sentence reconfining him after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44875 - 2014-09-15
. Marquel A. Harris appeals from an order denying his motion to modify a sentence reconfining him after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44875 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
an order denying his motion for sentence credit. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110322 - 2014-04-14
an order denying his motion for sentence credit. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110322 - 2014-04-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, appeals an order denying his motion for sentence credit. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110322 - 2017-09-21
, appeals an order denying his motion for sentence credit. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110322 - 2017-09-21
State v. Armando Salinas
trial, Salinas moved to suppress the statements he made to the police. The basis for this motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2399 - 2005-03-31
trial, Salinas moved to suppress the statements he made to the police. The basis for this motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2399 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
CURIAM. Marquel A. Harris appeals from an order denying his motion to modify a sentence reconfining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44875 - 2009-12-21
CURIAM. Marquel A. Harris appeals from an order denying his motion to modify a sentence reconfining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44875 - 2009-12-21
[PDF]
WI 10
the suppression motion, concluding that Kevin’s statements were admissible because “this was a non-custodial
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1096798 - 2026-03-26
the suppression motion, concluding that Kevin’s statements were admissible because “this was a non-custodial
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1096798 - 2026-03-26
COURT OF APPEALS
Nancy’s June 26, 2008 motion for contempt regarding the nonpayment of maintenance. At that hearing, Nancy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47434 - 2010-03-02
Nancy’s June 26, 2008 motion for contempt regarding the nonpayment of maintenance. At that hearing, Nancy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47434 - 2010-03-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
regarding Nancy’s June 26, 2008 motion for contempt regarding the nonpayment of maintenance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47434 - 2014-09-15
regarding Nancy’s June 26, 2008 motion for contempt regarding the nonpayment of maintenance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47434 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to five grams of cocaine, and from an order denying his postconviction motion. Lewis argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107212 - 2014-01-27
to five grams of cocaine, and from an order denying his postconviction motion. Lewis argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107212 - 2014-01-27
PED, Inc. v. Kenneth R. Loebel
-Third-Party Plaintiffs-Joint-Appellants, Paul Schmit, Al Stumpf and Joan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12464 - 2005-03-31
-Third-Party Plaintiffs-Joint-Appellants, Paul Schmit, Al Stumpf and Joan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12464 - 2005-03-31

