Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4061 - 4070 of 70109 for his.
Search results 4061 - 4070 of 70109 for his.
CA Blank Order
motion to modify his sentence. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96625 - 2013-05-06
motion to modify his sentence. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96625 - 2013-05-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
”). Skolos also appeals the court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration.1 The issue is whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871729 - 2024-11-07
”). Skolos also appeals the court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration.1 The issue is whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=871729 - 2024-11-07
[PDF]
State v. Clarence L. Martin
and was advised of his right to respond, but has elected not to do so. Upon our independent review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12396 - 2017-09-21
and was advised of his right to respond, but has elected not to do so. Upon our independent review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12396 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
. § 943.20(1)(b), Theft-Business Setting greater than $10,000. Attorney Koch converted for his own use funds
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53725 - 2010-08-24
. § 943.20(1)(b), Theft-Business Setting greater than $10,000. Attorney Koch converted for his own use funds
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53725 - 2010-08-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
. James B. Williams, pro se, appeals from an order denying his WIS. STAT. § 973.13 (2005-06)1 motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29188 - 2014-09-15
. James B. Williams, pro se, appeals from an order denying his WIS. STAT. § 973.13 (2005-06)1 motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29188 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report concluding there is no arguable basis for Mills to withdraw his guilty plea or challenge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170539 - 2017-09-21
report concluding there is no arguable basis for Mills to withdraw his guilty plea or challenge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170539 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Williams, pro se, appeals from an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 973.13 (2005-06)[1] motion seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29188 - 2007-05-29
. Williams, pro se, appeals from an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 973.13 (2005-06)[1] motion seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29188 - 2007-05-29
State v. Douglas M. Wilber
denying his postconviction motion. He argues that the circuit court improperly based its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16069 - 2005-03-31
denying his postconviction motion. He argues that the circuit court improperly based its sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16069 - 2005-03-31
Great West Casualty Company, Inc. v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
within the scope of his or her employment while driving to or from work only if the employer exercises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7986 - 2005-03-31
within the scope of his or her employment while driving to or from work only if the employer exercises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7986 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dujuan T. Nash
) (1999-2000).1 Nash also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4392 - 2017-09-19
) (1999-2000).1 Nash also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4392 - 2017-09-19