Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4061 - 4070 of 44675 for part.

Sandra K. Ward v. Dennis Jahnke
. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded with directions. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12791 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Spic and Span, Inc. v. Northwestern National Insurance Company of Milwaukee
for Milwaukee County: LAURENCE C. GRAM, JR., Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9165 - 2017-09-19

Lloyd D. Manthe, Sr. v. Town Board of the Town of Windsor
236.45(2)(b).[4] Section 8.7 of the 1979 ordinance provides, in relevant part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9042 - 2005-03-31

2011 WI APP 29
, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson and Brunner, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60057 - 2011-03-29

[PDF] William W. Welter v. City of Milwaukee
contract on the part of the city and of the board administering the system and (continued) No. 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11483 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Milwaukee Economic Development Corporation v. James Eisold
if Color Network failed to pay any part of the note when it came due. NO. 96-0641 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10476 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
court for Milwaukee County: TIMOTHY M. WITKOWIAK, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=336112 - 2021-02-16

COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Portage County: jon m. counsell, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part and causes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112698 - 2014-05-21

State v. Lisa A. Carter
. Affirmed in part; vacated in part. Before Brown, Nettesheim and Langhoff,[1] JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14142 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Lauderdale Lakes Lake Management District v. Armijit Sidhu
is part of the Lauderdale Lakes chain. ΒΆ3 The Sidhus own lots 1, 2, 3, and 9, which are adjacent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7134 - 2017-09-20