Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4061 - 4070 of 63933 for records/1000.

[PDF] State v. Harold W. Zastrow
the plea hearing record. Rather, we may look at the “totality of the circumstances” in deciding whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15628 - 2017-09-21

State v. Edward T.
a telephone conference under s. 807.13 on the record and only for so long as is necessary, taking into account
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21562 - 2006-02-27

[PDF] State v. Edward T.
a showing of good cause in open court or during a telephone conference under s. 807.13 on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21562 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of discretion. Id. at 65. We search the record for reasons to sustain the court’s exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89485 - 2014-09-15

State v. Harold W. Zastrow
to underscore that in reviewing his claim, we are not confined to looking at only the plea hearing record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15628 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
notwithstanding, the matter appeared ready for trial based on the record before it. The court rescheduled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41956 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Gaylene Schwalen v. James E. Howey
% standard is fair.2 Because the record supports the trial court’s discretionary determination, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2669 - 2017-09-19

Lauderdale Lakes Lake Management District v. Armijit Sidhu
the owners of record in the subdivision where the Sidhu property is located. Since the Sidhus had failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7134 - 2005-03-31

Opportunity Homes, Inc. v. John Malec
Illinois law.” The court has reviewed the record, however, and is unable to find where John argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5017 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. Id. at 65. We search the record for reasons to sustain the court’s exercise of discretion. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89485 - 2012-11-20