Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4061 - 4070 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Search results 4061 - 4070 of 58458 for speedy trial.
State v. John T. Neita
to §§ 161.14(7)(a), 161.41(1m)(cm)4, 939.05 and 161.48, Stats., 1991-92. The trial court imposed a fourteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9832 - 2005-03-31
to §§ 161.14(7)(a), 161.41(1m)(cm)4, 939.05 and 161.48, Stats., 1991-92. The trial court imposed a fourteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9832 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Foremost Industrial Exchange v. Scott Applin
responses from the defendants in that action, the trial court entered a default judgment against Obst
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17972 - 2017-09-21
responses from the defendants in that action, the trial court entered a default judgment against Obst
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17972 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Douglas E. Smith
. § 939.62, and from the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4933 - 2017-09-19
. § 939.62, and from the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4933 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert W. Gossar
) and 939.32(1)(a), Stats., and from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial.[1] Gossar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14311 - 2005-03-31
) and 939.32(1)(a), Stats., and from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial.[1] Gossar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14311 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
should grant him a new trial because his trial counsel was ineffective. In the alternative, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70759 - 2014-09-15
should grant him a new trial because his trial counsel was ineffective. In the alternative, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70759 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
should grant him a new trial because his trial counsel was ineffective. In the alternative, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70759 - 2011-09-12
should grant him a new trial because his trial counsel was ineffective. In the alternative, he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70759 - 2011-09-12
[PDF]
State v. Michael L. Washington
. Washington's attorney did not know that in Washington's previous trial on related drug charges, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9770 - 2017-09-19
. Washington's attorney did not know that in Washington's previous trial on related drug charges, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9770 - 2017-09-19
Timothy T. Llewellyn v. M&S Transportation, Inc
, and his parents, appeal from the trial court’s judgment dismissing their personal injury suit after a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12357 - 2005-03-31
, and his parents, appeal from the trial court’s judgment dismissing their personal injury suit after a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12357 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeramey J. Byrge
because the trial court did not advise him that the court could set a parole eligibility date pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13229 - 2005-03-31
because the trial court did not advise him that the court could set a parole eligibility date pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13229 - 2005-03-31
State v. Norman J.
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in deciding to terminate his parental rights. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5167 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in deciding to terminate his parental rights. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5167 - 2005-03-31