Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40601 - 40610 of 60151 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 40601 - 40610 of 60151 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
60, ¶25, 387 Wis. 2d 119, 928 N.W.2d 590. To establish a claim of ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=986582 - 2025-07-22
60, ¶25, 387 Wis. 2d 119, 928 N.W.2d 590. To establish a claim of ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=986582 - 2025-07-22
State v. Armando Hernandez-Diaz
denying him postconviction relief. He claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12187 - 2005-03-31
denying him postconviction relief. He claims that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12187 - 2005-03-31
Kimberly K. Hotz v. Russell L. Hotz
to address Kimberly's claim that the trial court erred in not deviating from the percentage standard, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8013 - 2005-03-31
to address Kimberly's claim that the trial court erred in not deviating from the percentage standard, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8013 - 2005-03-31
Gary E. Andrashko v. Gary R. McCaughtry
. The parties disagree on whether Andrashko had permission to be in auto-tag. Andrashko claims he took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8920 - 2005-03-31
. The parties disagree on whether Andrashko had permission to be in auto-tag. Andrashko claims he took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8920 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kim D. Tesky
. The reason you can be imprisoned up to three years is because they claim that, due to prior convictions, you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11185 - 2005-03-31
. The reason you can be imprisoned up to three years is because they claim that, due to prior convictions, you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11185 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
determined that Emanuele’s claim was barred because it had previously been considered and resolved by another
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50738 - 2010-06-07
determined that Emanuele’s claim was barred because it had previously been considered and resolved by another
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50738 - 2010-06-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
monthly restitution payments. ¶5 We review ineffective assistance claims as a mixed question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50322 - 2014-09-15
monthly restitution payments. ¶5 We review ineffective assistance claims as a mixed question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50322 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2007AP852 Cir. Ct. No. 2006CV501
and seven seconds; and (3) that Zellner acknowledged he had done so. Other claims of misconduct were
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32269 - 2014-09-15
and seven seconds; and (3) that Zellner acknowledged he had done so. Other claims of misconduct were
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32269 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his claimed indigency. The court found, in effect, that Fox was not indigent and that Fox
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622750 - 2023-02-16
his claimed indigency. The court found, in effect, that Fox was not indigent and that Fox
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622750 - 2023-02-16
State v. Steven S. Miller
claims that Haugrud was plainly biased. ¶5 State v. Faucher, 227 Wis. 2d 700, 717
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16219 - 2005-03-31
claims that Haugrud was plainly biased. ¶5 State v. Faucher, 227 Wis. 2d 700, 717
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16219 - 2005-03-31