Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40641 - 40650 of 58381 for speedy trial.
Search results 40641 - 40650 of 58381 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
WI APP 112
methodology as the trial court. Old Tuckaway Assocs. Ltd. P’ship v. City of Greenfield, 180 Wis. 2d 254
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33061 - 2014-09-15
methodology as the trial court. Old Tuckaway Assocs. Ltd. P’ship v. City of Greenfield, 180 Wis. 2d 254
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33061 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
by Wis. Stat. § 804.11(1)(b), such that no disputed issues of fact existed for trial and that Loper’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56518 - 2010-11-09
by Wis. Stat. § 804.11(1)(b), such that no disputed issues of fact existed for trial and that Loper’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56518 - 2010-11-09
COURT OF APPEALS
. Medrow argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82367 - 2012-05-14
. Medrow argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82367 - 2012-05-14
[PDF]
State v. Dennis Moslavac
warrant. FACTS In the trial court, the parties stipulated to the relevant facts. On March 11, 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14677 - 2017-09-21
warrant. FACTS In the trial court, the parties stipulated to the relevant facts. On March 11, 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14677 - 2017-09-21
Julie Ann Walberg v. St. Francis Home, Inc.
against St. Francis Home, Inc., and Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. Walberg argues the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6765 - 2005-03-31
against St. Francis Home, Inc., and Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. Walberg argues the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6765 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
additional felonies were dismissed and read in at sentencing. The trial court imposed five consecutive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60748 - 2014-09-15
additional felonies were dismissed and read in at sentencing. The trial court imposed five consecutive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60748 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and in how it ruled at trial on matters related to his expert witness.2 For the following reasons, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=842957 - 2024-08-28
and in how it ruled at trial on matters related to his expert witness.2 For the following reasons, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=842957 - 2024-08-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
issues of fact existed for trial and that Loper’s dilatory pattern and the “strong public preference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56518 - 2014-09-15
issues of fact existed for trial and that Loper’s dilatory pattern and the “strong public preference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56518 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
also appeals the order denying his motion to suppress. Medrow argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82367 - 2014-09-15
also appeals the order denying his motion to suppress. Medrow argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82367 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
LUNDSTEN, J.[1] Jennifer R.M. appeals an order committing her under Wis. Stat. ch. 51 after a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31512 - 2008-01-16
LUNDSTEN, J.[1] Jennifer R.M. appeals an order committing her under Wis. Stat. ch. 51 after a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31512 - 2008-01-16