Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40661 - 40670 of 46087 for paternity test paper work.

[PDF] WI App 175
to have jurors polled individually.” Id. at 61-62. “The purpose of jury polling is to test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28920 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Dairyland Greyhound Park, Inc. v. Scott McCallum
of a “legally protected” interest, as Dairyland argues. ¶15 The “interest” test applicable in Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5224 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
by conducting the four-factor test set forth in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 530 (1972). See Day v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=327603 - 2021-01-26

COURT OF APPEALS
to explain how each factor was satisfied. In doing so, Parchman failed to prove that he had met the test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36990 - 2009-07-06

Frontsheet
the Town's position of applying a "beneficial ownership" test, stating that "imposing a common law test
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51180 - 2010-06-17

[PDF] WI 47
a "beneficial ownership" test, stating that "imposing a common law test of ownership for tax assessment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51180 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI App 29
that has been held in this case, after the jury heard “evidence that a chemical test of a sample of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=787770 - 2024-06-20

[PDF] Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin v. Dane County Board of Adjustment
decline Montrose’s invitation to look to the “balancing of interest” test employed by some jurisdictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16099 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Lyn and Stephen Sills v. Walworth County Land Management Committee
the Committee’s decision. This invokes the substantial evidence test—a significant hurdle for the neighbors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3801 - 2017-09-20

2007 WI App 175
is to test the uncoerced unanimity of the verdict by requiring jurors to take individual responsibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28920 - 2007-09-18