Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40661 - 40670 of 60141 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 40661 - 40670 of 60141 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the informant’s claim that June was a heroin dealer was reliable. In contrast, the State characterizes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82117 - 2014-09-15
that the informant’s claim that June was a heroin dealer was reliable. In contrast, the State characterizes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82117 - 2014-09-15
Gary E. Andrashko v. Gary R. McCaughtry
. The parties disagree on whether Andrashko had permission to be in auto-tag. Andrashko claims he took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8920 - 2005-03-31
. The parties disagree on whether Andrashko had permission to be in auto-tag. Andrashko claims he took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8920 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
claims. See id. at 7- 10. ¶4 In 1997, Williams filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29957 - 2014-09-15
claims. See id. at 7- 10. ¶4 In 1997, Williams filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29957 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kim D. Tesky
. The reason you can be imprisoned up to three years is because they claim that, due to prior convictions, you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11185 - 2005-03-31
. The reason you can be imprisoned up to three years is because they claim that, due to prior convictions, you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11185 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
determined that Emanuele’s claim was barred because it had previously been considered and resolved by another
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50738 - 2010-06-07
determined that Emanuele’s claim was barred because it had previously been considered and resolved by another
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50738 - 2010-06-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
monthly restitution payments. ¶5 We review ineffective assistance claims as a mixed question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50322 - 2014-09-15
monthly restitution payments. ¶5 We review ineffective assistance claims as a mixed question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50322 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2007AP852 Cir. Ct. No. 2006CV501
and seven seconds; and (3) that Zellner acknowledged he had done so. Other claims of misconduct were
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32269 - 2014-09-15
and seven seconds; and (3) that Zellner acknowledged he had done so. Other claims of misconduct were
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32269 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his claimed indigency. The court found, in effect, that Fox was not indigent and that Fox
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622750 - 2023-02-16
his claimed indigency. The court found, in effect, that Fox was not indigent and that Fox
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622750 - 2023-02-16
State v. Steven S. Miller
claims that Haugrud was plainly biased. ¶5 State v. Faucher, 227 Wis. 2d 700, 717
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16219 - 2005-03-31
claims that Haugrud was plainly biased. ¶5 State v. Faucher, 227 Wis. 2d 700, 717
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16219 - 2005-03-31
Marcella J. Hopp v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
the value she claimed for it, $38,470.84. ¶4 This decision (Decision I) also included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5984 - 2005-03-31
the value she claimed for it, $38,470.84. ¶4 This decision (Decision I) also included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5984 - 2005-03-31