Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40671 - 40680 of 58492 for speedy trial.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
-day jury trial took place. Relevant to this appeal, during the testimony of case manager S.S., over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=643558 - 2023-04-11

[PDF] Edward A. Hinrichs v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
was not an underinsured motorist as defined in the policies. The trial court granted American Family’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2720 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Milton A. Bumpers
.” The trial court found that the request occurred “[a]bout three minutes later.” No. 01-0671 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3707 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and judgment should first be allowed to occur at the trial court level. In most cases, this should eliminate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92689 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Industrial Roofing Services, Inc. v. Randy J. Marquardt
dispositive motions. The court deferred scheduling the trial until after hearing any dispositive motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20820 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
on October 13 to try resolving the case because it would not be able to hold the factfinding/trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=511554 - 2022-04-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
intercourse, and threw her cell phone out the window.2 ¶3 The case proceeded to a jury trial in January
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=839487 - 2024-08-20

[PDF] Woodward Communications, Inc. v. Shockley Communications Corporation
to the trial court with instructions to dismiss the complaint. BACKGROUND ¶2 On May 3, 1996, Shockley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16315 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Jonathon R. K.
in a circuit court with criminal jurisdiction that makes it more desirable for trial and disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9206 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Liborio Cianciolo v. Antonina Cianciolo
judgment is to “avoid trials where there is nothing to try.” Caulfield v. Caulfield, 183 Wis. 2d 83, 91
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14903 - 2017-09-21