Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40681 - 40690 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 40681 - 40690 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Jimmy Williams
In postconviction proceedings, the trial court denied Williams’s motion to have the State crime lab perform
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3123 - 2013-11-12
In postconviction proceedings, the trial court denied Williams’s motion to have the State crime lab perform
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3123 - 2013-11-12
Melvina Young v. John S. Wright
against them in their efforts to rent an apartment from him. In a pretrial motion, Wright moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11208 - 2005-03-31
against them in their efforts to rent an apartment from him. In a pretrial motion, Wright moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11208 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
entered and (2) whether the circuit court erroneously denied West’s motion to suppress for lack
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103041 - 2013-10-15
entered and (2) whether the circuit court erroneously denied West’s motion to suppress for lack
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103041 - 2013-10-15
COURT OF APPEALS
also appeals an order denying his motion for a new trial in which he argued that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98118 - 2013-06-12
also appeals an order denying his motion for a new trial in which he argued that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98118 - 2013-06-12
Sheboygan County Department of Human Services v. Dawn R.
Dawn then brought a motion before the circuit court to dismiss the CHIPS petitions due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5956 - 2005-03-31
Dawn then brought a motion before the circuit court to dismiss the CHIPS petitions due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5956 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(collectively “the City”) filed a motion to dismiss the complaint arguing that it failed to state a claim upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173034 - 2017-09-21
(collectively “the City”) filed a motion to dismiss the complaint arguing that it failed to state a claim upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173034 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
, and orders denying motions for sentence modification in each case. We affirm for the reasons discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26847 - 2014-09-15
, and orders denying motions for sentence modification in each case. We affirm for the reasons discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26847 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a postconviction order denying his motion for sentence modification. The issue is whether the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52529 - 2010-07-26
a postconviction order denying his motion for sentence modification. The issue is whether the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52529 - 2010-07-26
COURT OF APPEALS
-degree intentional homicide and mutilation of a corpse and from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88861 - 2012-11-06
-degree intentional homicide and mutilation of a corpse and from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88861 - 2012-11-06
State v. Thomas J. Wilde
argues that his motion to suppress evidence should have been granted because the ordinance under which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4830 - 2005-03-31
argues that his motion to suppress evidence should have been granted because the ordinance under which he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4830 - 2005-03-31